___________________________________________________________________________________________________

Today's posts - Obama - Obamacare - Mark Steyn - Women - Children - Michelle O - Quoteworthy - Music - Books - Media bias - Culture - Best of P&P
___________________________________________________________________________________________________

When a society loses its memory, it descends inevitably into dementia. Mark Steyn

But community organizers, though often charismatic, can also be annoying jerks. Daniel Henninger
____________________________________________________________________________________________________________

Tuesday, September 7, 2010

Still not [White] House-trained

Grab that liberal rag and spread it thickly on the new carpet. It's no longer August but Obama is getting wee-weed up again, complaining yesterday in Milwaukee that "they talk about me like a dog." (See previous post.) The blogosphere emitted a collective "huh?" and then got busy with the jokes.

You may ask, can't he hear himself? Nope. Not even a faint echo.


Jim Geraghty:

Man, so many punchlines, so little space – “his bark is worse than his bite,” “this dog has had its day,” “we’re on to his dog and pony show,” “he’s made a dog’s breakfast of the economy,” “this explains why he always acts like he ate his own homework,” “the White House has gone to the dogs,” he’s howling at the moon, something about a ruined carpet, we feel like a fire hydrant, chasing the mailman, we’re all dog-tired of him, and finally, who let this dog out? …
Much more at Memeorandum.

Most recent posts here.

Monday, September 6, 2010

Who has been talking about Obama "like a dog"?

The strain of failure is beginning to take its toll on our president. A strange quote from today's speech in Milwaukee:

"Some powerful interests who had been dominating the agenda in Washington for a very long time and they're not always happy with me. They talk about me like a dog. That's not in my prepared remarks, but it's true," he told a crowd largely consisting of union members.
Watch the video. His handlers should never let him go off-prompter. In front of a friendly crowd he becomes even more full of himself and starts improvising what he seems to think are witty remarks. This one was just plain weird.

And who exactly are these mean "powerful interests"? Not the unions, I suppose, since he's speaking to a union crowd. Maybe he's talking about Nancy Pelosi? Or George Soros? Maybe Michelle is mad at him? We need to get to the bottom of this.

Hat tip: PoliPundit, who comments: "Whaaa?"


*Update: Here's more from today's speech. You'd think by this point even Obama would be tired of hearing himself pass the buck on the economy. But no.

Cross-posted at Potluck.

*Update: Mary Sue's comment from Potluck:

I think it is probably the business community and Wall Street, who’ve placed their bets on a GOP takeover after 19 months of being Obama’s whipping post. Mort Zuckerman says this all the time the business community bashes Obama. Now that they’ve taken their money to the GOP Pelosi is probably having a screaming fit behind the scenes and we know that the Dems up for re-election have been hammering him to get a message on the economy. Like any narcissist Obama can’t handle the criticism and starts railing about the special interests who hate him after his massive legislative accomplishments or something.

He evidently spent the rest of the time bashing the GOP, what a shocker that is. I don’t know if it ever dawned on the guy to do something – you know presidential – on a national holiday. He doesn’t have anything else to offer though; he is a one-trick pony.

Uh huh. But now we're talking about him like a pony.

Many thanks to MichelleMalkin.com for the Buzzworthy link.
Most recent posts here.

Still hoping the Obama magic will reappear

The White House and the Democratic Party are reportedly in a panic over the coming election. This is the first sign of sanity on the Dems' parts since they contracted the fever in 2007. Imminent job loss is, apparently, a potent treatment for Obama-induced delirium. It works for congressmen as well as voters.

But the liberal media, not feeling that job insecurity, and having already forsaken their journalistic integrity during the campaign, are not ready to let go of their messiah. Case in point: Jim VandeHei, executive editor of Politico, who gives a cogent analysis of the impending tsunami but by the end of the interview openly claps for Tinkerbell:

But VandeHei offered a glimmer of hope for President Obama and the Democrats.

"It's never too late," he said. "Think about how fickle we are in everything in life now, whether it's the cell phone that we choose or what we think about politics or what we do in our daily life. People are fickle.

"I still think you can start to pull people back," VandeHei said. "At the end of the day, it has to be that Obama has to find that magic. How can he get liberals to be as excited about him and about Democratic change as they were two years ago?
No, it doesn't "have to be." In fact, the magic can't be re-conjured. The Obama enchantment held only as long as Americans had no real knowledge of the man, his character, his incompetency, and his real agenda. The blanks have been filled in with bitter experience, and if there's any swooning to be done now, it's from anxiety for our country under his leadership. But keep wishing on those stars if it makes you feel better. As I noted back in April:
Obama fever has run its course and conferred immunity on a good part of the population. Those "surge voters" have reverted to their default state of apathy toward politics. Efforts to re-energize them have failed repeatedly since the election. Getting them whipped up for a midterm election is a doomed proposition. [. . .]

[Tim Kaine is] wrong about that magic. It has evaporated. But the anti-Obama magic is powerful. The reality of his agenda has energized lots and lots of voters who can hardly wait for November.
Truer now than it was last spring. (And does anyone believe that American "fickleness" extends to developing a taste for extended unemployment?)

Related:
Obama as Tinkerbell (11/09/09)
Magic trumped by reality (11/19/09)

And while we're reviewing, check out how perfectly my nearly-silent partner nailed Obama and his naive fans back in November '08.


Many thanks to MichelleMalkin.com for linking.
Most recent posts here.

Sunday, September 5, 2010

The temper tantrum continues: Strong disapproval for Obama hits new high

Among likely voters:

The Rasmussen Reports daily Presidential Tracking Poll for Sunday shows that 24% of the nation's voters Strongly Approve of the way that Barack Obama is performing his role as president. Forty-seven percent (47%) Strongly Disapprove, giving Obama a Presidential Approval Index rating of -23 (see trends). That’s the highest level of Strong Disapproval and the lowest Approval Index daily rating yet recorded for this president. [. . .]

Overall, 42% of voters say they at least somewhat approve of the president's performance. This matches the lowest approval rating yet measured for President Obama. Fifty-seven percent (57%) now disapprove.
Ingrates!

Most recent posts here.

Saturday, September 4, 2010

Various & sundry

Not exactly news that Jesse Jackson is a fraud but we'll take our diversions where we find them:

Read that again: Jackson’s Caddy SUV was stripped while he was in town promoting green jobs.

Add Jesse to the Al Gore-Tom Friedman-Barack Obama School of Environmental Hypocrisy. While preaching to Americans that they need to cram their families into hybrid Priuses to go shopping for compact fluorescent light bulbs to save the planet, they themselves continue to live large.


Jonah Goldberg on Obama's epic failure as a salesman:
In fairness, he’s tried to sell. He claimed the Gulf oil spill proves we need cap-and-trade. He told us from the Oval Office this week that we owe it to the troops to unite around his economic agenda. But these weren’t arguments so much as condescending harangues. No one who doesn’t already agree buys such nonsense. Rather, they ask, “How stupid does this guy think we are?”

Just as often, Obama confuses explanation for persuasion, as if simply telling us that because he thinks X, then X must be the way to go. More infuriating, nearly all of his explanations assume that disagreement with him must stem from ignorance or villainy. That pose worked a little when he could claim that opposition was synonymous with Republican partisanship. But now that disagreement has moved to the mainstream, he seems to have an adversarial relationship with the people he’s supposed to represent.



Eugene Robinson has a temper tantrum. The biggest laugh line: "This is not, I repeat not, a partisan argument." Mr. Robinson is living in a dream world in which the people are actually on board with the Obama agenda but upset because his remaking of America hasn't happened quickly enough.



If you missed Mark Steyn filling in for Rush this past Wednesday and Thursday, and if you have world enough and time (which I don't), you can listen on YouTube in eight to ten minutes segments. Part 1 of the 9/01 show is here. Hat tip: Kathy Shaidle's Talk Radio Watch.

Most recent posts here.

Cue laugh track: "Dems add fiscal austerity as campaign issue"

Even the Washington Post can barely keep a straight face with this one.

Sure, they've got bad policies and worse intentions, but you've got to give the Democrats credit for chutzpah: Democrats add fiscal austerity as a campaign issue

The candidate was outraged - just outraged - at the country's sorry fiscal state.

"We have managed to acquire $13 trillion of debt on our balance sheet," he fumed to a roomful of voters. "In my view, we have nothing to show for it."

And that was a Democrat, Sen. Michael Bennet of Colorado, who voted "yes" on the stimulus, the health-care overhaul, increased education funding and other costly bills Congress approved under his party's control.

[Insert your own expletive here.]

I'm thinking of starting the No Weasels Party.




Bennet would be among the first targeted for defeat, though he seems to be handling that just fine on his own:

Bennett [sic] hopes to capture these [independent] voters with his stern lectures on the budget. Seth Masket, a political science professor at the University of Denver, is not sure he can.

"It will be tough for him to paint himself as a deficit hawk," Masket said. "He's very visible as someone who is closely allied with President Obama."

It will also be tough to paint himself as someone with principles.

Most recent posts here.

Friday, September 3, 2010

Proof that Obama is engaged on the economy

Via Redstate, the Washington Post reports the saddest little bit of spin from Obama's advisers.

Perhaps you're thinking Obama isn't engaged on jobs and the economy? Well think again, doubters and deniers:

Last November, Obama announced that he would turn his attention to unemployment, calling it "one of the great challenges that remains in our economy." He declared the same intent two months later, telling House Democrats he would focus relentlessly on job creation "over the next several months." Senior aides went on television pledging that the mantra would become "jobs, jobs, jobs."

But other matters - health care, the BP oil spill - continually stole the limelight, creating the impression, some Democrats complain, that the president was barely focused on the economy at all.

His advisers described his attentiveness - noting, for example, that he discussed the economy with New York Mayor Michael R. Bloomberg (I) for 15 minutes before golfing - but got little traction. [emphasis added]

Dude. Seriously?

Obama doesn't give his minions a lot to work with, does he? The discontent among his advisers has got to be palpable at this point. The post-Obama-admin tell-all books are going to be diverting.

Meanwhile, back at the 2010 ranch, Dems are taking shots (anonymously) at their sorry excuse for a leader:

Over the past year, with the jobless rate hovering near 10 percent, Obama has repeatedly promised to shift from other matters to the economy. He did so again this week, saying during his Oval Office address on Iraq that he would turn to the economy "in the days to come."

But some Democratic candidates and political operatives feel the president is not doing enough to help them keep control of Congress, privately expressing frustration that Obama has recently emphasized issues other than the economy.

"We did the mosque, Katrina, Iraq, and now Middle East peace?" said a Democratic strategist who works closely with multiple candidates and spoke on the condition of anonymity. "And in between you redo the Oval Office? It has become a joke."

But not a funny one, since we're all suffering. I refrained from commenting on the Oval Office makeover because 1) all administrations do it, and 2) Obama didn't (I fervently hope) personally pore over the paint chips and swatches. But if his own party wants to complain about it, have at it.

Most recent posts here.

Senate in play?

Charlie Cook says yes:

For much of this year, it seemed a near mathematical impossibility that Republicans could score the 10-seat net gain needed to flip the Senate, which is split between 59 Democrats (including two independents who caucus with Democrats and largely vote with the party) and 41 Republicans. As recently as six weeks ago, I wrote in a CongressDailyAM column that a GOP win was "certainly possible" but "still fairly unlikely." Although the "fairly unlikely" part is still valid, the possibility of a GOP takeover is growing.

To be sure, a 10-seat gain for Republicans remains hard.

See Cook's column for a race-by-race breakdown. Bottom line:

With this many races in play, Democrats may have to perform triage and focus their resources on those that remain winnable. That means giving up on the rest.

Of the 18 competitive Senate races (this number doesn't include Vitter, Burr, or the seat in West Virginia), Republicans would need to win 16 to secure a majority, and certainly logic suggests that the odds of achieving this would be long in any remotely normal year. But the operative term is "in a normal year," which this is most certainly not.


Mark Steyn calls the coming tsunami a "tide of revulsion" and believes it may continue to gather strength as more and more Americans wake up to the reality of the Obama disaster. Even the yutes are feeling the bad vibrations.

Doug Mataconis tweets it simply:
The biggest things that will help the GOP in 2010 is that people who voted in 08 will stay home & people who stayed home in 08 will vote.

Thanks to MichelleMalkin.com for the Buzzworthy link.
Most recent posts here.

Send him no flowers

Just defeat Obama.

This almost-too-good-to-check item has been out there for a while, so apologies if you've already seen it. I hadn't. Actual obituary:

Robert W. Snyder, Jr. 1947 ~ 2010 Bob left us on June 19th after a day of doing what he loved, sailing the BJ at Soldier Creek with good friends and family. Bob was born September 2, 1947, at Mitchel Field AFB, in New York, the only son of Charlotte and Robert Snyder. After serving in the U.S. Navy, he married Connie and they began their life together in Denver. After a few years in Denver, the couple moved to Minneapolis where their son Michael was born in 1970. After a brief stay living in San Francisco they finally made their home in Utah where they raised their son and enjoyed many friends and family. Bob is survived by his wife, Connie, son, Mike (Wendy), granddaughter, Bailey, and sisters, Jean Allstun and Carol (Gary) Davis. Bob lived his life to the fullest and always found a way to have a good time. He had a way of making friends with everyone he met and will be missed by all who knew him. Services will be held Thursday, June 24, 2010 - 11:00 a.m. at Camp Williams, 17111 S. Camp Williams Road (Redwood Rd), Bluffdale, Utah. Family and close friends are welcome from 10:00 - 10:45 a.m. prior to the service. Arrangements in care of Olpin-Hoopes Funeral Home. Condolences may be sent to the family online at: www.olpinhoopes.com. In lieu of flowers and in memory of Bob's humorous outlook on life, please feel free to make contributions to whoever may be running against Obama in 2012.

May he rest in peace.

Thanks to Susie of Utah.

Most recent posts here.

Thursday, September 2, 2010

Good news and bad news

The good: Steyn is back. The bad: Obama's still here.

After his long, long, well-deserved hiatus Mark Steyn has returned, and I'm thrilled. Er, I think --

PRICED TO CLEAR
Mark, I’m writing to direct your attention to a Washington Times story from July 19, 2010 entitled, "Sperm Banks Says Donors Look Like Celebrities". Apparently, California Cryobank is offering a "Donor Look-A-Like" service, and according to the story, the look-a-like service includes an option for the "conservative intellectuals" who get "the choice of National Review columnist Mark Steyn".

I don't know whether you should feel honored or creeped out, but I thought you should be aware that your doppelganger is spreading his seed throughout California.

Gregory Hart

MARK SAYS: Hmm. This sounds like the beginning of one of those superhero stories where a radioactive spider falls into the beaker of Mark Steyn lookalike sperm, and next thing you know California is being terrorized by a giant Islamophobic showtune-singing tarantula. Either that, or we've got a great new prize for our Letter of the Week winner.

I love Mark Steyn as much as the next girl but an autographed copy of America Alone would be just fine, thank you. (And by the way, I posted something on the pseudo-Steyn sperm exactly a year ago today.)

It must have been difficult for Mark to keep silent through the months of July and August. We certainly missed his insights and humor terribly. I caught the second half of his stint on Rush today and couldn't agree more with his point about the seven-story hole at Ground Zero: a disgrace which speaks volumes about 21st century America.

More proof that something has gone awfully wrong in America: that guy we put in the Oval Office. Check out today's must-read from Victor Davis Hanson, who's come up with 10 excellent reasons why America misses W. Among them:

1) The Obama record. We naturally compare Bush to his chief critic and successor Barack Obama—and find the latter increasingly wanting as time goes by. Obama turned Bush’s misdemeanor deficits into felonious trillion-dollar annual shortfalls. He will pile up more debt than any other prior president.

Indeed, if, reelected, Obama will borrow more than all previous administrations combined. Bush was tarred in 2004 for a “jobless recovery” when unemployment hovered near 6%. It is now almost 10% and Obama still harps about “jobs saved”. Scott McClellan may have been singularly inept; we are not so sure after Robert Gibbs. For every Brownie there is a worse Van Jones or Anita Dunn. For Katrina we have BP. Bush’s NASA did space; Obama’s seems to prefer Muslim outreach. Bush’s prescription drug benefit was an unfunded liability; Obamacare is a trillion-dollar financial black-hole. I could go on, but Obama’s lackluster record is improving Bush’s legacy every day. [. . .]

5) Michelle is no Laura. Remember the narrative: conservative women are elitists who decorate, buy nice clothes and play Barbie; liberal first ladies are doers who are independent feminists that can’t be bothered by inanities like fashion and play. But Michelle this summer enjoyed a movable feast from Marbella to Martha’s Vineyard, in designer clothes and shades. Laura Bush used to vacation at the National Parks. Laura Bush often disagreed with her husband and sometimes offered a liberal “Oh, come on, George” to her husband’s occasional flight-suit strutting. Michelle, in contrast, is the second-half of the partisan Obama tag-team, perennially whining that “they raised the bar”. After “downright mean country” and “never been before proud”, we miss Laura Bush’s common sense and nonpartisanship. Ga-ga media talk of Michelle’s biceps, not the earthy decency reminiscent of a Laura Bush. [. . .]

10) Bush was authentic. He mangled his words. A liberal industry grew up around both “nuclar” and its sometimes corrective “nucular”. He strutted and talked Nascarese like “bring ‘em on”. Much of this was excessive, but we knew at least Bush meant it. We got worried when he extemporaneously expounded for long riffs about freedom at press conferences, as his eyes rolled and he drifted from topic to topic. He put his arm on Angela Merkel and cried out “Yo Blair.” The media told us he was a yokel; we might add albeit an authentic one who could duck properly when under shoe attack.

But Obama? He cannot really speak off the teleprompter without pauses, repetitions, and constant self-referencing (as is “me”, “I”, “my”, etc.). He is stiff and not comfortable with himself off the court or golf course. Bush made decisions and stuck by them; Obama the professor offers a perennial “on the one hand”/”on the other hand” mish-mash and a sorta, kinda, almost answer. Americans would prefer to be in a foxhole with George Bush, who would swagger, and announce as decider-in-chief at H-hour, “OK, pard, we’re going over the top together on this one.”—not Obama, who would stutter and give a long-drawn out exegesis why race and class had condemned us to such an unfair predicament, whose only solution was to go into a fetal position and condemn “them” who did this awful thing to us.

That's that far-from-first-class temperament of his. Also:

3) Bush Did It.

It is a uniquely American trait to shun whining and petulance. Rugged individualism and can-do optimism used to be ingrained in our national character, and even in our 11th hour have not wholly disappeared. So the public is tiring of Obama’s Pavlovian blaming of Bush. After 20 months, it is time for the President to get a life and quit the ‘heads you lose/tails I win’ attitude about presidential responsibility.
4) Who is the real yuppie?
Given the choice, the public would probably prefer a little overdone Texas “smoke ‘em out” braggadocio to worries over the price of arugula.
Heh. And . . .

9) Bush was not corrupt and ran an especially ethical administration.


What a falling off was there. Read the rest.

Most recent posts here.