___________________________________________________________________________________________________

Today's posts - Obama - Obamacare - Mark Steyn - Women - Children - Michelle O - Quoteworthy - Music - Books - Media bias - Culture - Best of P&P
___________________________________________________________________________________________________

When a society loses its memory, it descends inevitably into dementia. Mark Steyn

But community organizers, though often charismatic, can also be annoying jerks. Daniel Henninger
____________________________________________________________________________________________________________

Monday, January 26, 2009

Kirk: 'Things you should know about the stimulus bill'

If we still had the capacity to be shocked or appalled, we would be by the data provided below by Rep. Mark Kirk.

Do not miss item F. (!!!!!!!!)

From the Weekly Standard blog: Reasons to vote against stimulus
Gary Andres observes:

Looks like the Democrats are using the demand for stimulus to satiate their pent up demand for a lot of new spending unrelated to economic growth.
You betcha.

And he posts the following from Rep. Mark Kirk:


M E M O R A N D U M

TO: Members of the Appropriations Committee

FROM: Mark Kirk

DATE: January 21, 2009

RE: Things You Should Know About the Stimulus Bill

Here are some things you should know about the bill before our Committee today:

A. Large Taxpayer Cost Per Job Saved

Combined with the provisions of the Ways & Means Committee, this legislation will cost taxpayers $825 billion and claims to save “3.7 million” jobs. That means the government will save each job at an average cost of $222,972. Combined with the previous $700 billion bailout bill, the cost per job saved by recent congressional spending is $412,162 per job saved. On average, the private sector created 2007 jobs at a cost of $50,283 per job.

B. Most Items Are Unrelated to Economic Stimulus [oops - our bad!]

The legislation contains 152 separate appropriations. Only 34 line items have estimates in the committee report estimating jobs saved. 117 appropriations have no job saving estimate at all.

C. Major Job Producing Items Cost $65 Billion

Just 11 appropriations out of the 152 in the bill generate over 1,846,800 jobs at a total cost of $65 billion. These programs that have the highest payoff are some of the lower cost items:

1. Highway Infrastructure Investment (835,000 jobs, $35,928 each) $30B

2. Clean Water State Revolving Fund (282,000 jobs, $21,276 each) $6B

3. Transit Capital Assistance (165,000 jobs, $36,363 each) $6B

4. Child Care Development Block Grant (125,000 jobs, $16,000 each) $2B

5. Weatherization Assistance (104,000 jobs, $59,615 each) $6.2B

6. Drinking Water State Revolving Fund (94,000 jobs, $21,276 each) $2B

7. Grants-in-Aid for Airports (75,000 jobs, $40,000 each) $3B

8. Head Start (50,000 jobs, $42,000 each) $2.1B

9. State Energy Program (41,000 jobs, $82,926 each) $3.4B

10. Energy Efficiency & Conservation Grants (40,800 jobs, $85,784 each) $3.5B

11. Capital Investment Grants (35,000 jobs, $28,571 each) $1B

D. Bill Language Requires Extremely Fast Spending

Under Title I of the bill, all formula grants must be allocated within 30 days and all discretionary grants must be allocated within 90 days. This will require unprecedented speeds in federal spending.

E. Few and Friendly Economists Cited in Report, CBO Ignored

CBO reported that of the $550 billion in spending approved by this bill, only $26 billion will be spent in FY09. Of the $30 billion appropriated for highways, only $3 billion will be spent in FY09 and $4.2 billion in FY10. Over $60 billion of spending in the bill will not be spent during President Obama’s first term. CBO’s comment on the bill is not mentioned in the committee report.

The Committee report does cite the work of only three economists supporting this legislation: President Obama’s Chair of the Council of Economic Advisors, Christina Romer, Vice President Biden’s economic advisor, Jared Bernstein, and Mark Zandi of Moody’s Economy.com. Zandi is a political contributor to Sen. John McCain and Rep. Joe Sestak (D-PA). Zandi is quoted no less than six times.

F. Despite $550B in Spending, No Funds for Troops in Field

Despite spending $550 billion, no funds are provided for troops in Afghanistan or Iraq. The Defense Department estimates they will need $60-$80 billion soon to support immediate combat operations.

G. Funds Specifically Prohibited for Casinos, Aquariums and Pools, Not Bars

The text of the bill specifically prohibits funding from this bill to support “casinos, gaming institutions, aquariums, zoos, golf courses or swimming pools.” The prohibition does not mention bars or the pornography industry.

H. No Bipartisan Oversight

The bill creates an Accountability and Transparency Board. All board members are appointees of the President. [pay no attention to the man behind the curtain]

I. No Analysis of Unprecedented Trillion Borrowing Triggered by the Bill [but we're sure it will work out just fine]

There is no mention of the borrowing needed to finance this bill. CBO projects that if this legislation is passed, the federal government will need to borrow over $2 Trillion in the coming months. This will increase the public debt from $6 Trillion to $8 Trillion in a matter of weeks. No bond market has ever handled so much debt sold so quickly.

J. Very High Cost Broadband Provided at Taxpayer Expense

The bill creates a rural broadband program at a cost of $2.8 billion to serve 3.6 million people. Under these terms, the bill will provide broadband to rural (but not urban or suburban Americans) at a taxpayer cost of $784 each.

K. Funding Provided for Programs About to be Out-of-Date

The bill appropriates $650 million for digital-to-analog converter boxes despite the impending deadline of the program, announced two years ago of February 17, 2009.

I'd like Pundit to leave a comment, please, on this concept of jobs "created or saved." Throwing in that second word pretty much nullifies any meaning the numbers might have had.

1 comments:

Chicago Ray said...

good post here as he's my rep and sent me a nice email for supporting him for his vote on my blog that I may post on that blog when he responds with an OK. Good work

Post a Comment