Highlighted in previous post, but deserving of its own space here.
Weekly Standard quotes memorandum from Rep. Kirk:
When money is being thrown around with such unprecedented abandon, it's hard to understand how they could miss anything at all, let alone the war-fighters in Afghanistan and Iraq. But they seem to have their priorities.F. Despite $550B in Spending, No Funds for Troops in Field
Despite spending $550 billion, no funds are provided for troops in Afghanistan or Iraq. The Defense Department estimates they will need $60-$80 billion soon to support immediate combat operations.
Related post here.
4 comments:
It is supposed to be a stimulus plan.
Isn't the defense budget part of another plan ?
Not that these guys can do anything right.
Happy Birthday !
Am I late ?
Not too late :D Thanks!
And I get your point about defense, but when you look at all the stuff their spending on and calling stimulus . . .
Oops. I mean 'they're,' not 'their.' Hate that.
Post a Comment