Today's posts - Quoteworthy - Obamanalysis - Michelle O - Mark Steyn - Women - Children - Parenting - Education - Culture - Culture of death - Music - Sinatra - Books - Best of P&P - Twitter

When a society loses its memory, it descends inevitably into dementia. Mark Steyn
.

April 9, 2009

Rasmussen: socialism vs. capitalism

Rasmussen: Only 53% of Americans believe capitalism is better than socialism

It's the under-30 crowd that is most confused. I'm not the least surprised by this. Over and over during the presidential campaign I heard Americans on talk radio ask, "What's wrong with socialism? What's the matter with the way they do things in France, or Canada?" I've tried to write posts about it but have done a poor job of trying to explain to a hypothetical citizen just what is wrong with socialism. The bottom line is that many people frankly don't know what socialism is.

Here's part of a post I started last fall:

A civil, well-spoken woman called a conservative talk-radio show a few weeks back and asked the above question. All her life, she's been hearing that Europe is more culturally evolved and sophisticated than the U.S., and she hasn't probed beyond these assumptions. She wondered, what is so bad about France, for example?

Her question originated in the "spread the wealth" controversy brought up during the presidential campaign by Joe Wurzelbacher.

The answer she received from the host, about long waits for inferior medical care, super-high tax rates, and the injustice of turning your hard-earned pay over to the government, was all right as far as it went. But it wasn't going to break through her long-held unexamined opinions.

This woman needed to hear some of the following:

Socialism kills vitality and creativity. The nanny state, with all its entitlements, is the super-sized enabler of a dependent, malcontent, apathetic populace. Like the over-indulgent parent who is heavy on the material things but light on the time-investment that leads to real maturity and independence, socialist governments oversee populations of disaffected Peter Pans.

Why would we want to emulate Europe? I suspect many Americans, without being fully aware of it, hold on to a romanticized view of a culturally superior Europe. This image doesn't hold up to an examination of the real life in France, Germany, Italy, Greece, Spain, etc. Or Canada, so close to us but so infrequently on our radar screen. Why have conservative leaders failed to make better use of Canada as an example of the failures of socialism? Perhaps it's because there are so very few conservatives who are willing to articulate a real 'no' to socialistic policies.

One reason socialism is hard to fight is its power to co-opt people by creating a sense of entitlement in their minds. Voters who choose higher taxes and vote for the candidate who offers to take care of them have been seduced by socialism. Like the White Witch's turkish delight, it creates a desire for more and a blindness to the damage it inflicts on the human will.

Europe as we once knew it is nearly extinct. The cause of death is demographic suicide from low birthrates. Europe is not creative artistically, either. Its popular culture is mostly derived from America. Europe's scientists do not remain in Europe, but settle in the US to do their work.

Europe's people aren't happy. Socialism has sapped their vitality. Work is not rewarding. Content to let the government handle the important decisions, the people focus on entitlements and leisure, but don't gain satisfaction from them. From Mark Steyn's America Alone:
The European Union got rid of all the supposed obstacles to happiness -- war, politics, the burden of work, insufficient leisure time, tiresome dependents -- and yet their people are strikingly gloomy. (p. 110)
He cites number to back this up. Asked in 2002 if they were optimistic about the future, the following said yes: 43% of Canadians, 42% Brit's, 29% Frenchmen, 23% Russians, and 15% Germans. Contrast that to Americans, who answered 61% in the affirmative.
And there it abruptly ends.

Someone, somewhere, somehow, and it won't come from the public schools and even less from the colleges and universities, needs to educate our children on the meaning of socialism. That means parents. I haven't read it yet, but I wonder if Liberty and Tyranny might be a good tool for this effort.

Most recent posts here.

8 comments:

  1. You might want to mention that socialism is also predicated on Marxism, especially demonstrably wrong Marxist economic theory. Those theories are responsible for a staggering amount of genocidal deaths this century encompassing Stalin's 10 million+ killing rampage, the Nazi's holocaust, Pol Pot's killing fields, Mao's Cultural Revolution and the Great Leap Forward.

    And, just to top it all off, it doesn't work. Israel's kibbutzes (probably the best chance for socialism to work) are falling apart from the fact that people don't like it when they're expected to share the limited luxuries that they earned with people who did not earn them-- but who demand and unthankfully expect them.

    ReplyDelete
  2. Ooops! Sorry... I meant to mention that allowing the Left to divorce socialism from communism (impossible in political theory without massive and creative re-definitions) has allowed for socialism to seem more appealing.

    ReplyDelete
  3. Thanks for filling in. I'm ill-equipped to discourse on this. But that doesn't stop me.

    It kills me that socialism is a proven failure but that so many Americans are even more ignorant than I am. And they romanticize Euro-socialism and even socialized medicine.

    ReplyDelete
  4. I'm right there with ya on this one. I've tried to explain it also and I just go nuts when people say, "Well Cuba isn't so bad...".

    I get the same thing on the national health care issue. "Well it works in other countries!"

    Is anybody paying attention?

    ReplyDelete
  5. Good thing the poll wasn't of the Congressional Black Caucus.

    Yikes !

    ReplyDelete
  6. Aren't they incredible? They heart Cuba and Castro.

    ReplyDelete
  7. Not to try and be rude about this, but I have to disagree with you guys and this article. First off, if any of you have been in a public school recently or read the textbooks you would realize that they are anything but pro-socialism. Many of them state without any real reason that all of the nations that are leaning towards socialism are suffering even when they have higher standards of living than America. For Cuba, you may say their universal health care is suffering, yet they are far more advanced and better covered than Americans (if you'd do your research) even without gaining the benefit of trade and sharing ideas with us. I honestly believe that for a developing country, Capitalism is a necessary evil being that to make it into the upper-echelon of powers a nation must be willing to throw a certain amount of its citizens under the bus for the advancement of the nation. Just look at the working conditions in the early 20th century. Once a nation makes it to the top though, its responsibility should turn towards protecting its citizens once it can afford to. Obviously the flaw in Socialism is that everybody is inherently greedy caused by 200 years in a capitalism society. You may say that is human nature, but I'd be willing to wager (this is without any research or evidence to back it up, of course) that after 200 years of education of Socialism being the way to live we would in a world free of many of the issues that plague our modern world such as war, plague, famine and bigotry.

    ReplyDelete
  8. Excellent post. It is very distressing the lack of knowledge of the basics of economic theory among our electorate.

    If anyone would like more information, they can read my five part series, "Commune to Capitalism" beginning at this link http://rightviewpoint.com/?p=63

    Joe Howell
    Editor, The Right Viewpoint
    http://www.rightviewpoint.com

    ReplyDelete

You can comment anonymously but please give yourself some kind of name. It makes discussion a lot easier. Thanks.