Today's posts - Quoteworthy - Obamanalysis - Michelle O - Mark Steyn - Women - Children - Parenting - Education - Culture - Culture of death - Music - Sinatra - Books - Best of P&P - Twitter

When a society loses its memory, it descends inevitably into dementia. Mark Steyn
.

November 6, 2009

Red flags abounded before Fort Hood massacre

Michelle Malkin: The massacre at Fort Hood and Muslim soldiers with attitude

I’ve said it many times over the years and it bears repeating again as cable TV talking heads ask in bewilderment how all the red flags Hasan raised could have been ignored: Political correctness is the handmaiden of terror.
Jihad Watch: Fort Hood jihad shooter was disciplined for Islamic proselytizing
and Jihad at Fort Hood
Major Nidal Malik Hasan, a U.S. Army psychiatrist, murdered twelve people and wounded twenty-one [sic] inside Fort Hood in Texas yesterday, while, according to eyewitnesses, "shouting something in Arabic while he was shooting." Investigators are scratching their heads and expressing puzzlement about why he did it. According to NPR [1], "the motive behind the shootings was not immediately clear, officials said." The Washington Post [2] agreed: "The motive remains unclear, although some sources reported the suspect is opposed to U.S. involvement in Afghanistan and Iraq and upset about an imminent deployment." The Huffington Post spun faster, asserting that "there is no concrete reporting as to whether Nidal Malik Hasan was in fact a Muslim or an Arab."

Yet there was, and what's more, Major Hasan's motive was perfectly clear -- but it was one that the forces of political correctness and the Islamic advocacy groups in the United States have been working for years to obscure. So it is that now that another major jihad terror attack has taken place on American soil, authorities and the mainstream media are at a loss to explain why it happened - and the abundant evidence that it was a jihad attack is ignored.

Pamela Geller:
Shlep Smith has the jihadi's cousin on the phone, Nader Hasan, and Schlep is lapping up the lies and he is doing the taqiya. Nader is saying the Malik was a great American. Hasan is saying that the mass murderer "was harassed" and that's why he methodically planned and executed this massive attack on a US military installation.

He was not a convert. He is a devout Muslim who joined the army with a purpose.

The details are emerging and the sickening, horrifying conclusion is that this could have, and should have been, prevented by removing Hasan from the US Army:

Hasan was put on probation early in his postgraduate work at the Uniformed Service University of the Health Sciences in Bethesda, Md. He was disciplined for proselytizing about his Muslim faith with patients and colleagues, according to the source, who worked with him at the time. NPR

Federal law enforcement officials say the suspected Fort Hood, Texas, shooter had come to their attention at least six months ago because of Internet postings that discussed suicide bombings and other threats.

The officials spoke on condition of anonymity because they were not authorized to discuss the case.

One of the Web postings that authorities reviewed is a blog that equates suicide bombers with a soldier throwing himself on a grenade to save the lives of his comrades. (more here)

On his blog is a link to an article "Martyrdom in Islam vs Suicide Bombing"

He was happy about the Muslim solider who shot and killed a soldier and wounded another at a Little Rock Military recruiting station. Hasan said Muslims should rise up against the aggressors. Maybe we should have more of these.....strapping bombs on and going into Times Square".

The officials had access to Maj. Nidal Malik Hasan's military record. They said he received a poor performance evaluation while at Walter Reed.

They promoted him to major. Jihadi Malik should have been removed from military service. Yes, the lawsuits would have been flying, but so what? Those great Americans would still be alive.

This was "not the act of a crazy". This was not the random act of a nutcase. It was execution style, close range. He shot 44 - 50 rounds - that's a lot of ammunition to come out of those two guns in such a short period of time. This was premeditated. "A deliberate act of execution of the largest army base in America".

Neighbors say he was giving away his possessions this morning and PASSING OUT QURANS. Newscaster: "he was proud of his religion".

See Hot Air for the story as it evolved. Smoking gun here:
Evidently CNN is airing surveillance footage from a convenience store camera taken this just morning showing Hasan in a traditional Muslim cap and robe. Supposedly, according to an employee, he talked about his deployment and said he didn’t want to kill other Muslims. I’ll update with the clip once they post it.
Video is there now.

Oremus.

Updates:

*RS McCain quotes the following from Allen West:
"This enemy preys on downtrodden soldiers and teaches them extremism will lift them up," West said. "Our soldiers are being brainwashed."
**From the AP:
Soldiers who witnessed the shooting rampage at Fort Hood that left 13 people dead reported that the gunman shouted "Allahu Akbar!" before opening fire, the base commander said Friday.

Lt. Gen. Robert Cone said officials had not yet confirmed that the suspected shooter, Maj. Nidal Malik Hasan, made the comment, which is Arabic for "God is great!" before the rampage Thursday, which left 30 people wounded, including the gunman.

Follow up: WaPo's sympathy for the devil, Can a flag get any redder?

Linked at Michelle Malkin (buzzworthy)

Most recent posts here.

4 comments:

  1. The Huffington Post spun faster, asserting that "there is no concrete reporting as to whether Nidal Malik Hasan was in fact a Muslim or an Arab." Y

    Yeah, I was thinking he was Chinese since Nidal Malik Hasan is such a common name, especially in Beijing.
    I laughed out loud at this one. This could have been a line from an SNL skit.
    I can't wait to see if the NYT will try to out-do this one.
    ReplyDelete
  2. From Tehran to Texas, the question is the same. "Are you with us, or are you with them?" This was a chant by the Iranian anti-government demonstrators heard yesterday on the streets of Tehran and a play on Obama's name which in Farsi means, "he is with us."

    Goli Ameri, Iranian-born, former U.S. Asst Sec. of State for Educational & Cultural Affairs, commented this morning (Fri. 06Nov09) on Fox News on how the courageous demonstrators in Tehran had turned the tables on this annual govt-staged event recalling the Iranian hostage crisis.

    According to Ms Ameri, one of the chants they were shouting was a play on words, specifically on President Obama's name which, in Farsi means, "he is with us."

    The chant was a question: "Are you with us, or are you with them?"--'them' meaning the radical Islamic regime with its murderous stranglehold on Iran.

    It occurred to me that the tens of thousands of Americans marching on DC protesting Obama-care,

    ...or the hundreds of thousands of Americans wondering this morning how many other Kool-Aid drinking, Islamo-fascist crazies have we failed to screen in this country due to political correctness run amuck,

    ...or the millions of Americans wondering how many more soldiers have to die needlessly in Afghanistan begging for troop support while Mr Obama weighs his political options,

    ...could all be chanting the same question in solidarity with the freedom-loving Iranians who are being ignored by Obama while he continues to try and "earn" his "ig-Nobel Peace Prize" by appeasing our enemies.
    ReplyDelete
  3. The Huffington Post, Keith Olbermann and DailyKos are directly responsible for this tragedy.

    Everyone at MSNBC should be put on trial and executed for complicity in murder.

    (It only seems fair to apply the Democrats' own methods to them. Alinsky, after all.)
    ReplyDelete
  4. Even by the low standards of partisan rhetoric, this is pretty sad.

    Malkin is using this murder to attack political correctness?

    Didn't she learn anything from Fallwell's stupidity?

    Geller thinks this many wasn't crazy? Is she suggesting that murdering a dozen people is somehow sane?

    "Execution-style? Close range?" The specifics haven't even been released yet - and she's making the argument that premeditation 1) has been established and 2) somehow excludes the possibility that the man was nuts.

    I hate to break it to people, but crazy people make plans all the time. Witness the Va Tech shooter, Columbine. Certifiably psychotic people going through detailed plans to kill the highest number of people they could.

    The implication that this man was a "jihadi" may be correct, or not. And there may have been warning signs, or not. But at this stage in the game - it would make the most sense to figure out what REALLY happened before you start throwing rocks.

    Otherwise, you just look like political opportunists.
    ReplyDelete