Today's posts - Quoteworthy - Obamanalysis - Michelle O - Mark Steyn - Women - Children - Parenting - Education - Culture - Culture of death - Music - Sinatra - Books - Best of P&P - Twitter

When a society loses its memory, it descends inevitably into dementia. Mark Steyn
.

March 30, 2010

Obama's overpriced student loans

Another way to stick it to the young. Sen. Lamar Alexander:

“As Americans find out what it really does, they’ll be really unhappy,” Alexander predicts. “The first really unhappy people will be the 19 million students who, after July 1, will have no choice but to go to federal call centers to get their student loans. They’ll become even unhappier when they find out that the government is charging 2.8 percent to borrow the money and 6.8 percent to lend it to the students, and spending the difference on the new health-care bill and other programs. In other words, the government will be overcharging 19 million students.” The overcharge is “significant,” Alexander adds, because “on a $25,000 student loan, which is an average loan, the amount the government will overcharge will average between $1,700 and $1,800.”

“Up to now, 15 out of 19 million student loans were private loans, backed by the government,” Alexander says. “Now we’re going to borrow half-a-trillion from China to pay for billions in new loans. Not only will this add to the debt, but in the middle of a recession, this will throw 31,000 Americans working at community banks and non-profit lenders out of work.”

And that ain't all. Read the rest. Then read this post by Richard Vedder:
President Obama’s signing of the education bill is triply disastrous. First, he violated basic tenets of representative democracy by tying otherwise politically unattainable education changes to the health-care bill.

Second, the bill’s student loan provisions will not save the $68 billion promised, and will move the country closer to a European-style socialism that has brought that continent stagnation. Going to a Soviet/U.S. Postal Service model of student-loan services goes against the sound maxim that competition is always better than monopoly. Moreover, the bill’s repayment terms will lead to increasing student-loan defaults, adding to the crushing fiscal burden on a government whose IOUs are now trusted less than those of some private corporations.
Read the rest at the Corner.


Most recent posts here.

4 comments:

  1. Sen. Alexander is pretty funny.

    He's saying that the Student Loan reform is a government takeover in one sentence, and in the next he's saying that “Up to now, 15 out of 19 million student loans were private loans, backed by the government."

    In other words, by his own admission - Student loans were already a government program. The government's been guaranteeing them for decades - and the reason they've had to is because otherwise banks wouldn't touch them.

    Lending money to cash strapped students (with no job and no credit history) makes for high interest rates or variable rates. The government stepped in to guarantee loans so private banks would lend to students at fixed rates.

    Sen. Alexander is trying to convince you that the government is getting a markup under the new program - ignoring the fact that the private banks have been making at least this amount on markup in the past (and sometimes as high as 12%).

    Lamar's whining because his favorite constituency, the Banks, will be cut out of the transactions. According to the CBO this program will save $6 billion tax dollars per year - but the GOP is crying because the bill will cut a corporate subsidy.

    Nice to see the GOP's priorities are right where they've always been.
    ReplyDelete
  2. Think this is bad, wait till they tie it to an incentive like your family being in a union or you joining a union. Or being on govt healthcare or be willing to "work it off" in a collective type arrangement. Or that you can get a loan for being a GP but not an engineer because they need doctors.

    It is all coming down the line. It isn't like they are inventing the wheel.
    ReplyDelete
  3. When I was a student, my dad was the co-signer, because he had the job and I didn't. Has the student loan business changed that much in 25 years, where the student is the lone signatory? If so, no wonder things are screwed up.
    ReplyDelete
  4. Now we will see if they are smart enough to realize this and then if they are motivated enough to get off their butts come November to change it.
    ReplyDelete