Today's posts - Quoteworthy - Obamanalysis - Michelle O - Mark Steyn - Women - Children - Parenting - Education - Culture - Culture of death - Music - Sinatra - Books - Best of P&P - Twitter

When a society loses its memory, it descends inevitably into dementia. Mark Steyn
.

May 31, 2010

Intrepidity and sacrifice

Just a few of the moving Memorial Day tributes out there today:
Someone to Remember this Memorial Day
Memorial Day 2010: Giving Thanks for Those Who Made the Ultimate Sacrifice
For this Memorial Day
Remembering Those Who Have Served
Photo essay: Honor After the Fall (h/t: Pat Austin)
Reagan's 1984 speech at the Tomb of the Unknowns
Remembering the Forgotten
First Memorial Day
Memorial Day: Heroes

Reprise from Memorial Day 2009: For conspicuous gallantry and intrepidity

Grab your kids and browse through the 3400 Medal of Honor citations (a few below) or get a book from the library and sit down with it together. They need to know about the heroes who have made, and continue to make, their way of life possible.


From one of the citations below:

When an exploding enemy mortar round severed 2d Lt. Bobo's right leg below the knee, he refused to be evacuated and insisted upon being placed in a firing position to cover the movement of the command group to a better location. With a web belt around his leg serving as a tourniquet and with his leg jammed into the dirt to curtain [sic] the bleeding, he remained in this position and delivered devastating fire into the ranks of the enemy attempting to overrun the marines.


*STOWERS, FREDDIE (WWI)

Corporal Stowers, distinguished himself by exceptional heroism on 28 September 1918 while serving as a squad leader in Company C, 371st Infantry Regiment, 93d Division. His company was the lead company during the attack on Hill 188, Champagne Marne Sector, France, during World War I. A few minutes after the attack began, the enemy ceased firing and began climbing up onto the parapets of the trenches, holding up their arms as if wishing to surrender. The enemy's actions caused the American forces to cease fire and to come out into the open. As the company started forward and when within about 100 meters of the trench line, the enemy jumped back into their trenches and greeted Corporal Stowers' company with interlocking bands of machine gun fire and mortar fire causing well over fifty percent casualties. Faced with incredible enemy resistance, Corporal Stowers took charge, setting such a courageous example of personal bravery and leadership that he inspired his men to follow him in the attack. With extraordinary heroism and complete disregard of personal danger under devastating fire, he crawled forward leading his squad toward an enemy machine gun nest, which was causing heavy casualties to his company. After fierce fighting, the machine gun position was destroyed and the enemy soldiers were killed. Displaying great courage and intrepidity Corporal Stowers continued to press the attack against a determined enemy. While crawling forward and urging his men to continue the attack on a second trench line, he was gravely wounded by machine gun fire. Although Corporal Stowers was mortally wounded, he pressed forward, urging on the members of his squad, until he died. Inspired by the heroism and display of bravery of Corporal Stowers, his company continued the attack against incredible odds, contributing to the capture of Hill 188 and causing heavy enemy casualties. Corporal Stowers' conspicuous gallantry, extraordinary heroism, and supreme devotion to his men were well above and beyond the call of duty, follow the finest traditions of military service, and reflect the utmost credit on him and the United States Army.

*MUNRO, DOUGLAS ALBERT (WWII)

Rank and organization: Signalman First Class, U.S. Coast Guard Born: 11 October 1919, Vancouver, British Columbia. Accredited to Washington. Citation: For extraordinary heroism and conspicuous gallantry m action above and beyond the call of duty as Petty Officer in Charge of a group of 24 Higgins boats, engaged in the evacuation of a battalion of marines trapped by enemy Japanese forces at Point Cruz Guadalcanal, on 27 September 1942. After making preliminary plans for the evacuation of nearly 500 beleaguered marines, Munro, under constant strafing by enemy machineguns on the island, and at great risk of his life, daringly led 5 of his small craft toward the shore. As he closed the beach, he signaled the others to land, and then in order to draw the enemy's fire and protect the heavily loaded boats, he valiantly placed his craft with its 2 small guns as a shield between the beachhead and the Japanese. When the perilous task of evacuation was nearly completed, Munro was instantly killed by enemy fire, but his crew, 2 of whom were wounded, carried on until the last boat had loaded and cleared the beach. By his outstanding leadership, expert planning, and dauntless devotion to duty, he and his courageous comrades undoubtedly saved the lives of many who otherwise would have perished. He gallantly gave his life for his country.

*MERRELL, JOSEPH F. (WWII)

Rank and organization: Private, U.S. Army, Company I, 15th Infantry, 3d Infantry Division. Place and date: Near Lohe, Germany, 18 April 1945. Entered service at: Staten Island, N.Y. Birth: Staten Island, N.Y. G.O. No.: 21, 26 February 1946. Citation: He made a gallant, 1-man attack against vastly superior enemy forces near Lohe, Germany. His unit, attempting a quick conquest of hostile hill positions that would open the route to Nuremberg before the enemy could organize his defense of that city, was pinned down by brutal fire from rifles, machine pistols, and 2 heavy machineguns. Entirely on his own initiative, Pvt. Merrell began a single-handed assault. He ran 100 yards through concentrated fire, barely escaping death at each stride, and at pointblank range engaged 4 German machine pistolmen with his rifle, killing all of them while their bullets ripped his uniform. As he started forward again, his rifle was smashed by a sniper's bullet, leaving him armed only with 3 grenades. But he did not hesitate. He zigzagged 200 yards through a hail of bullets to within 10 yards of the first machinegun, where he hurled 2 grenades and then rushed the position ready to fight with his bare hands if necessary. In the emplacement he seized a Luger pistol and killed what Germans had survived the grenade blast. Rearmed, he crawled toward the second machinegun located 30 yards away, killing 4 Germans in camouflaged foxholes on the way, but himself receiving a critical wound in the abdomen. And yet he went on, staggering, bleeding, disregarding bullets which tore through the folds of his clothing and glanced off his helmet. He threw his last grenade into the machinegun nest and stumbled on to wipe out the crew. He had completed this self-appointed task when a machine pistol burst killed him instantly. In his spectacular 1-man attack Pvt. Merrell killed 6 Germans in the first machinegun emplacement, 7 in the next, and an additional 10 infantrymen who were astride his path to the weapons which would have decimated his unit had he not assumed the burden of the assault and stormed the enemy positions with utter fearlessness, intrepidity of the highest order, and a willingness to sacrifice his own life so that his comrades could go on to victory.

*PAGE, JOHN U. D. (Korea)

Rank and organization: Lieutenant Colonel, U.S. Army, X Corps Artillery, while attached to the 52d Transportation Truck Battalion. Place and date: Near Chosin Reservoir, Korea, 29 November to 10 December 1950. Entered service at: St. Paul, Minn. Born: 8 February 1904, Malahi Island, Luzon, Philippine Islands. G.O. No.: 21, 25 April 1957. Citation: Lt. Col. Page, a member of X Corps Artillery, distinguished himself by conspicuous gallantry and intrepidity in action above and beyond the call of duty in a series of exploits. On 29 November, Lt. Col. Page left X Corps Headquarters at Hamhung with the mission of establishing traffic control on the main supply route to 1st Marine Division positions and those of some Army elements on the Chosin Reservoir plateau. Having completed his mission Lt. Col. Page was free to return to the safety of Hamhung but chose to remain on the plateau to aid an isolated signal station, thus being cut off with elements of the marine division. After rescuing his jeep driver by breaking up an ambush near a destroyed bridge Lt. Col. Page reached the lines of a surrounded marine garrison at Koto-ri. He then voluntarily developed and trained a reserve force of assorted army troops trapped with the marines. By exemplary leadership and tireless devotion he made an effective tactical unit available. In order that casualties might be evacuated, an airstrip was improvised on frozen ground partly outside of the Koto-ri defense perimeter which was continually under enemy attack. During 2 such attacks, Lt. Col. Page exposed himself on the airstrip to direct fire on the enemy, and twice mounted the rear deck of a tank, manning the machine gun on the turret to drive the enemy back into a no man's land. On 3 December while being flown low over enemy lines in a light observation plane, Lt. Col. Page dropped handgrenades on Chinese positions and sprayed foxholes with automatic fire from his carbine. After 10 days of constant fighting the marine and army units in the vicinity of the Chosin Reservoir had succeeded in gathering at the edge of the plateau and Lt. Col. Page was flown to Hamhung to arrange for artillery support of the beleaguered troops attempting to break out. Again Lt. Col. Page refused an opportunity to remain in safety and returned to give every assistance to his comrades. As the column slowly moved south Lt. Col. Page joined the rear guard. When it neared the entrance to a narrow pass it came under frequent attacks on both flanks. Mounting an abandoned tank Lt. Col. Page manned the machine gun, braved heavy return fire, and covered the passing vehicles until the danger diminished. Later when another attack threatened his section of the convoy, then in the middle of the pass, Lt. Col. Page took a machine gun to the hillside and delivered effective counterfire, remaining exposed while men and vehicles passed through the ambuscade. On the night of 10 December the convoy reached the bottom of the pass but was halted by a strong enemy force at the front and on both flanks. Deadly small-arms fire poured into the column. Realizing the danger to the column as it lay motionless, Lt. Col. Page fought his way to the head of the column and plunged forward into the heart of the hostile position. His intrepid action so surprised the enemy that their ranks became disordered and suffered heavy casualties. Heedless of his safety, as he had been throughout the preceding 10 days, Lt. Col. Page remained forward, fiercely engaging the enemy single-handed until mortally wounded. By his valiant and aggressive spirit Lt. Col. Page enabled friendly forces to stand off the enemy. His outstanding courage, unswerving devotion to duty, and supreme self-sacrifice reflect great credit upon Lt. Col. Page and are in the highest tradition of the military service.

*PITSENBARGER WILLIAM H. (Vietnam)

The President of the United States of America, authorized by Act of Congress, March 3, 1863, has awarded in the name of The Congress the Medal of Honor to

AIRMAN FIRST CLASS WILLIAM H. PITSENBARGER
UNITED STATES AIR FORCE

For conspicuous gallantry and intrepidity at the risk of his life above and beyond the call of duty. Airman First Class Pitsenbarger distinguished himself by extreme valor on 11 April 1966 near Cam My, Republic of Vietnam, while assigned as a Pararescue Crew Member, Detachment 6, 38th Aerospace Rescue and Recovery Squadron. On that date, Airman Pitsenbarger was aboard a rescue helicopter responding to a call for evacuation of casualties incurred in an ongoing firefight between elements of the United States Army's 1st Infantry Division and a sizeable enemy force approximately 35 miles east of Saigon. With complete disregard for personal safety, Airman Pitsenbarger volunteered to ride a hoist more than one hundred feet through the jungle, to the ground. On the ground, he organized and coordinated rescue efforts, cared for the wounded, prepared casualties for evacuation, and insured that the recovery operation continued in a smooth and orderly fashion. Through his personal efforts, the evacuation of the wounded was greatly expedited. As each of the nine casualties evacuated that day was recovered, Airman Pitsenbarger refused evacuation in order to get more wounded soldiers to safety. After several pick-ups, one of the two rescue helicopters involved in the evacuation was struck by heavy enemy ground fire and was forced to leave the scene for an emergency landing. Airman Pitsenbarger stayed behind on the ground to perform medical duties. Shortly thereafter, the area came under sniper and mortar fire. During a subsequent attempt to evacuate the site, American forces came under heavy assault by a large Viet Cong force. When the enemy launched the assault, the evacuation was called off and Airman Pitsenbarger took up arms with the besieged infantrymen. He courageously resisted the enemy, braving intense gunfire to gather and distribute vital ammunition to American defenders. As the battle raged on, he repeatedly exposed himself to enemy fire to care for the wounded, pull them out of the line of fire, and return fire whenever he could, during which time he was wounded three times. Despite his wounds, he valiantly fought on, simultaneously treating as many wounded as possible. In the vicious fighting that followed, the American forces suffered 80 percent casualties as their perimeter was breached, and Airman Pitsenbarger was fatally wounded. Airman Pitsenbarger exposed himself to almost certain death by staying on the ground, and perished while saving the lives of wounded infantrymen. His bravery and determination exemplify the highest professional standards and traditions of military service and reflect great credit upon himself, his unit, and the United States Air Force.

*BOBO, JOHN P. (Vietnam)

Rank and organization: Second Lieutenant, U.S. Marine Corps Reserve, 3d Battalion, 9th Marines, 3d Marine Division (Rein), FMF. Place and date: Quang Tri Province, Republic of Vietnam, 30 March 1967. Entered service at: Buffalo, N.Y. Born: 14 February 1943, Niagara Falls, N.Y. Citation: For conspicuous gallantry and intrepidity at the risk of his life above and beyond the call of duty. Company 1 was establishing night ambush sites when the command group was attacked by a reinforced North Vietnamese company supported by heavy automatic weapons and mortar fire. 2d Lt. Bobo immediately organized a hasty defense and moved from position to position encouraging the outnumbered marines despite the murderous enemy fire. Recovering a rocket launcher from among the friendly casualties, he organized a new launcher team and directed its fire into the enemy machine gun positions. When an exploding enemy mortar round severed 2d Lt. Bobo's right leg below the knee, he refused to be evacuated and insisted upon being placed in a firing position to cover the movement of the command group to a better location. With a web belt around his leg serving as a tourniquet and with his leg jammed into the dirt to curtain [sic] the bleeding, he remained in this position and delivered devastating fire into the ranks of the enemy attempting to overrun the marines. 2d Lt. Bobo was mortally wounded while firing his weapon into the main point of the enemy attack but his valiant spirit inspired his men to heroic efforts, and his tenacious stand enabled the command group to gain a protective position where it repulsed the enemy onslaught. 2d Lt. Bobo's superb leadership, dauntless courage, and bold initiative reflected great credit upon himself and upheld the highest traditions of the Marine Corps and the U.S. Naval Service. He gallantly gave his life for his country.

*MARTINI, GARY W. (Vietnam)

Rank and organization: Private First Class, U.S. Marine Corps, Company F, 2d Battalion, 1st Marines, 1st Marine Division. place and date: Binh Son, Republic of Vietnam, 21 April 1967. Entered service at: portland, Oreg. Born: 21 September 1948, Lexington, Va. Citation: For conspicuous gallantry and intrepidity at the risk of his life above and beyond the call of duty. On 21 April 1967, during Operation UNION* elements of Company F, conducting offensive operations at Binh Son, encountered a firmly entrenched enemy force and immediately deployed to engage them. The marines in Pfc. Martini's platoon assaulted across an open rice paddy to within 20 meters of the enemy trench line where they were suddenly struck by hand grenades, intense small arms, automatic weapons, and mortar fire. The enemy onslaught killed 14 and wounded 18 marines, pinning the remainder of the platoon down behind a low paddy dike. In the face of imminent danger, Pfc. Martini immediately crawled over the dike to a forward open area within 15 meters of the enemy position where, continuously exposed to the hostile fire, he hurled hand grenades, killing several of the enemy. Crawling back through the intense fire, he rejoined his platoon which had moved to the relative safety of a trench line. From this position he observed several of his wounded comrades Lying helpless in the fire-swept paddy. Although he knew that 1 man had been killed attempting to assist the wounded, Pfc. Martini raced through the open area and dragged a comrade back to a friendly position. In spite of a serious wound received during this first daring rescue, he again braved the unrelenting fury of the enemy fire to aid another companion Lying wounded only 20 meters in front of the enemy trench line. As he reached the fallen marine, he received a mortal wound, but disregarding his own condition, he began to drag the marine toward his platoon's position. Observing men from his unit attempting to leave the security of their position to aid him, concerned only for their safety, he called to them to remain under cover, and through a final supreme effort, moved his injured comrade to where he could be pulled to safety, before he fell, succumbing to his wounds. Stouthearted and indomitable, Pfc. Martini unhesitatingly yielded his life to save 2 of his comrades and insure the safety of the remainder of his platoon. His outstanding courage, valiant fighting spirit and selfless devotion to duty reflected the highest credit upon himself, the Marine Corps, and the U.S. Naval Service. He gallantly gave his life for his country.

*MURPHY, MICHAEL P. (Afghanistan)

Rank and Organization: Lieutenant, United States Navy
For conspicuous gallantry and intrepidity at the risk of his life above and beyond the call of duty as the leader of a special reconnaissance element with Naval Special Warfare Task Unit Afghanistan on 27 and 28 June 2005. While leading a mission to locate a high-level anti-coalition militia leader, Lieutenant Murphy demonstrated extraordinary heroism in the face of grave danger in the vicinity of Asadabad, Konar Province, Afghanistan. On 28 June 2005, operating in an extremely rugged enemy-controlled area, Lieutenant Murphy's team was discovered by anti-coalition militia sympathizers, who revealed their position to Taliban fighters. As a result, between 30 and 40 enemy fighters besieged his four-member team. Demonstrating exceptional resolve, Lieutenant Murphy valiantly led his men in engaging the large enemy force. The ensuing fierce firefight resulted in numerous enemy casualties, as well as the wounding of all four members of the team. Ignoring his own wounds and demonstrating exceptional composure, Lieutenant Murphy continued to lead and encourage his men. When the primary communicator fell mortally wounded, Lieutenant Murphy repeatedly attempted to call for assistance for his beleaguered teammates. Realizing the impossibility of communicating in the extreme terrain, and in the face of almost certain death, he fought his way into open terrain to gain a better position to transmit a call. This deliberate, heroic act deprived him of cover, exposing him to direct enemy fire. Finally achieving contact with his Headquarters, Lieutenant Murphy maintained his exposed position while he provided his location and requested immediate support for his team. In his final act of bravery, he continued to engage the enemy until he was mortally wounded, gallantly giving his life for his country and for the cause of freedom. By his selfless leadership, courageous actions, and extraordinary devotion to duty, Lieutenant Murphy reflected great credit upon himself and upheld the highest traditions of the United States Naval Service.

*MONSOOR, MICHAEL, A. (Iraq)

Rank and Organization: Master-At-Arms Second Class (Sea, Air And Land), United States Navy
For conspicuous gallantry and intrepidity at the risk of his life above and beyond the call of duty as automatic weapons gunner for Naval Special Warfare Task Group Arabian Peninsula, in support of Operation IRAQI FREEDOM on 29 September 2006. As a member of a combined SEAL and Iraqi Army Sniper Overwatch Element, tasked with providing early warning and stand-off protection from a rooftop in an insurgent held sector of Ar Ramadi, Iraq, Petty Officer Monsoor distinguished himself by his exceptional bravery in the face of grave danger. In the early morning, insurgents prepared to execute a coordinated attack by reconnoitering the area around the element's position. Element snipers thwarted the enemy's initial attempt by eliminating two insurgents. The enemy continued to assault the element, engaging them with a rocket-propelled grenade and small arms fire. As enemy activity increased, Petty Officer Monsoor took position with his machine gun between two teammates on an outcropping of the roof. While the SEALs vigilantly watched for enemy activity, an insurgent threw a hand grenade from an unseen location, which bounced off Petty Officer Monsoor's chest and landed in front of him. Although only he could have escaped the blast, Petty Officer Monsoor chose instead to protect his teammates. Instantly and without regard for his own safety, he threw himself onto the grenade to absorb the force of the explosion with his body, saving the lives of his two teammates. By his undaunted courage, fighting spirit, and unwavering devotion to duty in the face of certain death, Petty Officer Monsoor gallantly gave his life for his country, thereby reflecting great credit upon himself and upholding the highest traditions of the United States Naval Service.
Most recent posts here.

May 30, 2010

The Trouble With Ayers

Remember that old Hitchcock movie, The Trouble with Harry? One of my favorites as it wasn't too scary, kinda funny, set in a little New England town, and this inconvenient body kept showing up.

Well, I keep coming back to Barack Obama. And Bill Ayers.

...Here's a clip:)


Most recent posts here.

Blogging the Gulf Oil Spill

Lots of folks around the blogosphere are writing about the Gulf oil spill today.

Carol at No Sheeples Here has created another wonderful PhotoShop image and is finding humor in Toby Hamden's piece which I found pretty funny, too. I mean, the entire situation in the Gulf is so not funny, but Hamden eviscerates OilBama and his response to the crisis. This line, in particular, summed it up for me, as well as for Carol:


His approach to the issue was that of the law student suddenly fascinated by a science project.

Exactly. Perfect.

Little Miss Attila makes an excellent point, which, I'm sure, the environmentalists will ignore:

Folks, what the hell is so much less delicate about the Gulf of Mexico than ANWR, where we could drill much more safely than in the Gulf? Nothing—that’s what. The ecosystems in the Gulf are far more vulnerable than those in ANWR—as are the local economies that depend on them.
Gateway Pundit has video of Liz Cheney's evaluation of Obama's response:

"Going down to Louisiana and saying, 'Gosh, you know I'm heartbroken, I'm angry, I'm frustrated, and then going on vacation to Chicago really doesn't send a message that this is a man who is leading."

She's correct; as I said earlier, appearances count for something. That's why George W. Bush quit playing golf after the outbreak of the Iraq war because he said,

"I didn't want some mom whose son may have recently died to see the commander in chief playing golf. I feel I owe it to the families to be in solidarity as best as I can with them. And I think playing golf during a war just sends the wrong signal."

Clearly, Obama doesn't share that opinion.

No, he's Mr. Cool, Mr. Cerebral, "the most intelligent president" we've ever had.

And finally, don't miss Don Surber, who ties it all together, nicely.

What.A.Mess.

Cross Posted at And So it Goes in Shreveport


Most recent posts here.

A Chicago Tea Partier's view of The One's return home

The woman who took on CNN's Susan Roesgen at last year's TaxDayTeaParty, illustrating the ongoing media fraud, and gave a ringing speech at this year's, pens some thoughts on Barack Obama's return to Chicago this weekend. Kathy Barkulis, SmartGirl Politics.

More. Via RCP:
Obama's Fascinating Job Description - James Taranto, Wall Street Journal
James Carville's Rage - Ruben Navarrette, San Diego Union-Tribune
Obama Looks Like an Old Hand at the Chicago Way - Chicago Tribune

--crossposted at BackyardConservative

More. Nation of Islam and Friends of Obama. And Byron York, DC Examiner. HT Memeorandum.

Most recent posts here.

May 29, 2010

Ode to the Almost Dead

Writing in the Weekly Standard, P.J. O'Rourke has hit upon a wonderful idea: pre-obituaries. O'Rourke writes of the possibilities:


Jimmy Carter is 85. We must hasten to throw the Camp David Accord in his face before he heads to his eternal camp-out with Anwar el-Sadat. Gore Vidal is 84. There’s no chance he’ll end up in the same place as Bill Buckley. We ought to take up Buckley’s gauntlet and slap Gore’s face here and now. Noam Chomsky is 81. Why should Satan have all the fun? We own pitchforks of fact aplenty with which to prod his living flesh. Norman Lear is 87 and will be married to Maude forever any minute now. (Although Lear may find himself forgiven. He never meant to make Archie Bunker a hero and a role model, but perhaps the road to heaven is paved with bad intentions.) Ed Asner is 80. Put him together with Ben Bradlee (88) and Alan J. Pakula, director of All the President’s Men (died in 1998, darn it), and you have the villains in the tragic tale of the American newspaper’s self-congratulatory ossification. Ross Perot also will be 80 soon. We owe him one Bill Clinton-sized philippic. Ralph Nader is 76. High time that someone, metaphorically, flipped him in a Corvair. And Paul Ehrlich is 78. In these days of the graying workforce, baby bust, and demographic decline, surely he needs a population bomb in his underpants.

The beauty of obituaries for the still-extant is that they needn’t be limited to those who are about to go home feet first. Preemptive necrology can be practiced on persons who are in the prime of life, especially if they’ve had their little turn in the limelight and will never do anything else of note if they live to be 1,000.
When I read that last sentence I immediately thought of Al Gore. Let's face it, Gore's "best years" are behind him, though I doubt he has noticed. What better way to close the chapter on three decades of hot air than to write a final tribute to the demise of Gore's broken religion?

O'Rourke suggests many candidates for pre-obits-from Bernie Sanders to Lindsay Lohan. In Lohan's case it would seem that if somebody desires to write a pre-obit they had better hurry. The point being that are many among us, or in their estimation, above us, whose time has come and gone. Why not celebrate?

Cross posted at Carol's Closet

Honoring the Fallen

On this Memorial Day weekend, the WSJ has an interesting history lesson for us regarding the transport of our war dead:

Bringing fallen troops home is a relatively modern idea. Until the late 19th century, military authorities did little to differentiate and identify dead troops...The modern system for cataloguing and burying military dead effectively began during the Civil War, when the enormity of the carnage triggered a wholesale revolution in how the U.S. treated fallen troops. Congress decided that the defenders of the Union were worthy of special burial sites for their sacrifices, and set up a program of national cemeteries.

During the war, more than 300,000 dead Union soldiers were buried in small cemeteries scattered across broad swaths of the U.S. When the fighting stopped, military authorities launched an ambitious effort to collect the remains and rebury them in the handful of national cemeteries.
In both World Wars families were given a choice regarding the burial of their loved ones; they could be brought home or buried in overseas cemeteries - Normandy, for example.  And, oh, the Pacific:

World War II posed a bigger logistical challenge, since American war dead were scattered around the globe. Nearly 80,000 U.S. troops died in the Pacific, for example, and 65,000 of their bodies were first buried in almost 200 battlefield cemeteries there.

Once the fighting ended, the bodies were dug up and consolidated into larger regional graveyards. The first returns of World War II dead took place in the fall of 1947, six years after the attack at Pearl Harbor. Eventually, 171,000 of the roughly 280,000 identified remains were brought back to the U.S.

The process has improved since then and time delays for the return of fallen warriors are not what they were.  Those that are charged with the job of returning our war dead to their families take their task very seriously and very hard.  The emotional toll is tremendous but it matters a great deal to them that the families know that their fallen are being treated with love and respect every step of the way.

TIME has a photo essay here, and if it doesn't bring you to tears, you're made of stone.

We are burying one of our local soldiers in Minden, Louisiana today, Spc. Joshua Tomlinson, and the entire area is grieving.  It hits home all over the nation.

Take a moment this weekend to remember the fallen, and their families, and those that have brought them home.



Cross posted at And So it Goes in Shreveport


Most recent posts here.

Murky Saturday

Mark Steyn guts The One's claim to "steering currents" and resuscitates the reputation of King Canute.

Over at The Corner, Sen. John McCain, our elder statesman, caustically suggests our President Barack Obama is out of his depth. Don't we like crusty old McCain better than we did, chastened by defeat, stung by this president's rejection of any bipartisanship at all. More here.

And we are left to wonder if there are any grown-ups in the White House.

...Remember, we asked the same thing after Bill Clinton's cult of personality presidency.

May 28, 2010

I can see a gusher from my house

Pooor Barack. Even his most finger in the wind defenders are unhappy with him. Peggy Noonan: He Was Supposed to Be Competent The spill is a disaster for the president and his political philosophy:

I don't see how the president's position and popularity can survive the oil spill. This is his third political disaster in his first 18 months in office. And they were all, as they say, unforced errors, meaning they were shaped by the president's political judgment and instincts.

There was the tearing and unnecessary war over his health-care proposal and its cost. There was his day-to-day indifference to the views and hopes of the majority of voters regarding illegal immigration. And now the past almost 40 days of dodging and dithering in the face of an environmental calamity. I don't see how you politically survive this.

The president, in my view, continues to govern in a way that suggests he is chronically detached from the central and immediate concerns of his countrymen.
Hill and Bill's ragin' Cajun James Carville snarled at the Barackstar, we're about to die down here.

Even a Carter era Dem, The New Yorker's Hendrik Herzberg damns with faint praise...

More here.

Friday various & sundry

Michelle Malkin on our strangely disengaged president:

“I am angry and frustrated,” he heaved. Rather unconvincingly. He was “singularly focused,” he asserted. Rather distractedly. The president did manage to work up enough energy to condemn BP and then turned to a moment of obligatory self-aggrandizement: “I’m confident that people are going to look back and say that this administration was on top of what was an unprecedented crisis.” [. . .]

Then, addressing all the ignorant Americans who have failed to appreciate his rescue efforts, Obama mustered up a semblance of indignation: “Those who think we were either slow in our response or lacked urgency don’t know the facts. This has been our highest priority since this crisis occurred.”

And this is the Obama definition of accountability: blaming everyone else for lacking the Ivy League–honed comprehension skills to see the greatness of his fortitude and foresight.

How high of a priority did his administration really make the post-spill cleanup? After droning on haltingly about the federal failure to form an “oil . . . tracking . . . flow . . . group,” Obama admitted with a shrug: “There was a lag of several weeks that shouldn’t have happened.”
Read the rest.

Jim Geraghty's summary of Obama's stance toward the crisis: We’re In Control, I Just Don’t Know What We’re Doing. Just relax, all you folks in voter-land. The oil spill is one of his tippity-top top priorities.

Krauthammer on who else might be to blame:
There will always be catastrophic oil spills. You make them as rare as humanly possible, but where would you rather have one: in the Gulf of Mexico, upon which thousands depend for their livelihood, or in the Arctic, where there are practically no people? All spills seriously damage wildlife. That's a given. But why have we pushed the drilling from the barren to the populated, from the remote wilderness to a center of fishing, shipping, tourism and recreation?

Not that the environmentalists are the only ones to blame. Not by far. But it is odd that they've escaped any mention at all.

RTR.

On the economy, Mark Steyn:

Back in 2008, when I was fulminating against multiculturalism on a more or less weekly basis, a reader wrote to advise me to lighten up, on the grounds that “we’re rich enough to afford to be stupid.”

Two years later, we’re a lot less rich. In fact, many Western nations are, in any objective sense, insolvent. Hence last week’s column, on the EU’s decision to toss a trillion dollars into the great sucking maw of Greece’s public-sector kleptocracy. It no longer matters whether you’re intellectually in favour of European-style social democracy: simply as a practical matter, it’s unaffordable.

He sounds kinda like that mean Chris Christie: "Unlike the United States of America, the state of New Jersey can't just print money."

But Hillary thinks she knows where to find more:
'The rich are not paying their fair share'
If this is her idea of a winning strategy for 2012 she might want to think again. With a redistributor par excellence in the Oval office, we're on to that one.


I saved the very best for last:
White House Jester Beheaded For Making Fun Of Soaring National Debt
h/t: Hot Air


Note to readers: I'm going to be busy for the next couple of days and have invited a few excellent guest bloggers to fill in here. Enjoy, and have a great weekend.

Most recent posts here.

May 27, 2010

He is not a crook UPDATED

Obama at today's press conference, concerning Sestak-gate: "I am not a crook." Oops. "We could do that, but it would be wrong." That's not quite right either. Here it is:

"I can assure the public that nothing improper took place."
It will all be cleared up "shortly."

A simple statement of what actually happened is apparently out of the question.

I don't imagine for a second that this will end in impeachment, but I wouldn't want to get on Rep. Darrell Issa's bad side, either:

"Congressman Sestak has continued to repeat his story whenever asked without varying from the original version,” reads the e-mail [from Issa]. “The White House however has arrogantly and wrongly assumed that they can sweep this matter under the rug.”

"This may be the way business is done in Chicago, but it’s not the way things are done in our nation’s capitol, and I am intent on getting to the bottom of this,” he wrote.

Actually, I'm afraid it is the way it's done in DC. But that doesn't make it right.

Speaking of Chicago, the first family departed for their hometown this afternoon. But you know what they say about going home again:

Obama moved to Chicago to establish his political base, but now the city is a political liability. [. . .]

Giannoulis, it should be recalled, was one of those Obama intimates who assured reporters that the president would hang on to his Hyde Park lifestyle.

"There are some little things that make him enjoy life, and he's not just going to give all of that up," Giannoulias said after the 2008 election and before his own career became subprime.

But Obama seemed to give it up rather easily.

All Chicagoans have to show for having Obama in the White House is one presidential trip home, a failed bid to get the 2016 Olympics and a proposal to relocate the terrorists at Guantanamo Bay to a state prison in northern Illinois.

I've heard of people growing apart, but trying to send somebody Kahlid Sheik Mohammed is grounds for divorce.

Read the rest. Obama may or may not be a crook, but plenty of his Chicago pals are.

*Update, Friday morning: The plot thickens. Sestak acknowledges that all involved are coordinating their stories:

Richard Sestak, who has served as his brother's top political adviser and campaign lawyer, spoke with administration officials Wednesday, Joe Sestak said.

"They got ahold of my brother on his cellphone, and he spoke to the White House . . . about what's going to occur," said Sestak, who said he expects the White House will release its information Friday. He declined to elaborate on his discussions with his brother.

Betcha the White House wishes Sestak could keep his mouth shut. But it may not matter much, the way his memory is going:
"Something happened last July, literally, hardly even remember it," Sestak said of the offer. "All of a sudden, in this interview, someone asked a question . . . and I answered it up front. But I immediately said the same thing I said to you and haven't deviated: Look, let's move on, the rest is politics."
Michelle Malkin has more.

Most recent posts here.

Red China: Man tries to auction off small son

Man's inhumanity to man son, illustrated: Chained to a lamp post, the terrified Chinese boy whose poverty-stricken father tried to sell him on the street:

Yong Tsui put up a small table with a sign on it giving his son's age, name, and his capacity for hard work. He took bids from strangers to take the boy off his hands.

But when interested parties began to ask how easy it would be to feed him, passers-by decided enough was enough.
Then they caught him in a chokehold. Click above for photos.

Horrifying, absolutely. But that last bit is mildly comforting.

Most recent posts here.

Obama: 'Toughest year and a half since the 30's'

Oh man. This is too much. Daniel Halper:

President Barack Obama, at an exclusive fundraiser last night in San Francisco for Senator Barbara Boxer:

Let's face it this has been the toughest year and a half since any year and a half since the 1930s.

This is the most revealing comment Obama has made publicly in a long while. It shows his self-absorption and utter lack of a sense of history.

Sure, FDR had a tough ‘30s with the economy and all, but by the time the ‘40s hit, it was smooth sailing. (What’s worse: the Nazis and the threat of world-dominating totalitarianism or the obstructionist Republicans?) And President Harry Truman really had an easy time ending World War II, and having to nuke the Japanese. President Dwight Eisenhower only had the Korean War to worry about – and who remembers that, anyway? JFK and LBJ had Vietnam – not to mention the worry that the Russians might nuke America from Cuba, or any other place in the world, etc., etc., etc. [RTR]

Not to mention the clear sailing for President Bush in the autumn of 2001. Has Obama forgotten 9/11 and its aftermath?

He was never qualified for the presidency, temperamentally or otherwise, and he's not rising to the occasion. And aside from the perks, he doesn't seem to enjoy the job. It's too hard or something.

If you suffer from hypotension, read some more of his remarks here. Sample:
“I had wrapped like a gift, a welcoming gift for me, a $1.3 trillion deficit,” he said. “So we had to act quickly.”
Because . . . $1.3 trillion wasn't nearly high enough?


Many thanks to Michelle Malkin for the Buzzworthy link.
Most recent posts here.

May 26, 2010

Issa utters the 'I' word

The Sestak affair isn't going away. Rep. Darrell Issa calls it an impeachable offense:

Rep. Joe Sestak's allegation that the White House offered him a job to drop out of the Pennsylvania Senate primary race against Arlen Specter is a crime that could lead to the impeachment of President Obama, Rep. Darrell Issa said.

But the decision by the Pennsylvania congressman not to elaborate on a so-called deal also could become a political problem as Sestak tries for the U.S. Senate seat.

The White House reportedly is going to formally address the allegation in the next few days. In the meantime, Issa, R-Calif., is one of many inside and outside Washington who want the Democratic Senate primary candidate to explain in detail what offer the White House made.

"It's very clear that allegation is one that everyone from Arlen Spector to Dick Morris has said is in fact a crime, and could be impeachable," said Issa, who is threatening to file an ethics compliant if Sestak doesn't provide more details about the alleged job offer.
All seven Republican members of the Senate Judiciary Committee are calling for an independent investigation. See Allahpundit for analysis. Related: Attention please: If this happened, it was a felony.


Other news:

Claro que si! As predicted by many on the right, the 1200 National Guardsmen being sent "to the border" will have nothing to do with protecting Arizona's borders. They will not even be armed. Krauthammer and Malkin were right. AFP:
[State Department spokesman Philip Crowley] said the extra troops would be used to free up civilians engaged in support functions so that law enforcement personnel can be increased along the 2,000-mile-long (3,200 kilometer) border.
No problema.


Mark Hemingway attends Joe Biden's Middle Class Task Force meeting so we don't have to. I think we owe him one. It sounds godawful:

Biden came in through the back launched into a meandering soliloquy about how the economy was back on track thanks to the Recovery Act, a.k.a. stimulus. There’s a lot of rambling, but essentially the Vice-President wants to pat himself on the back for this claim: “Things are going much better. Very few people doubt any longer we’ve created somewhere, as the Council of Economic Advisers said between 2.2 to 2.8 million jobs.” [. . .]

But no matter, because it quickly became apparent that they were uninterested making any sort of economic argument. The panel consisted of Biden, a friendly Democratic labor bureaucrat from New York state, along with two small business owners and two employees that benefited from a jobs subsidy program.

The whole thing was a farce. Suffice to say, that when the government gives people checks to hire workers they are grateful for the money. They told their stories. One of the workers on the panel, Tamara Washington, actually broke down in tears describing how grateful she was to have a job.


The president has finally been hounded into having a press conference. It will take place at the White House tomorrow. Mark Knoller has categorized and counted the various interactions Obama has had with the press:

The numbers reveal that Mr. Obama finds news conferences less appealing a format for conveying his views than one-on-one interviews.

With the sole exception of Bret Baier's interview, in which the interviewer didn't roll over and play dead for the president. Knoller:

Keep those numbers in mind as you watch Mr. Obama field questions tomorrow. Most will focus on the oil spill and criticism that he was slow to respond to the crisis, a charge his immediate predecessor faced in 2005 in the days after Hurricane Katrina.

Also keep an eye on what you perceive to be the president's comfort level as he faces questions on other matters. Then, make a guess as to how long it will be before his next press conference.
Will anyone ask about the Sestak affair?

Many thanks to Doug Ross and Michelle Malkin for linking.
Most recent posts here.

Poll: A personal worst for Obama

Will 1200 National Guardsmen to the AZ border (Krauthammer calls it a stunt), or maybe an awesome Gulf photo op boost the president's approval ratings? (He'd better be careful not to get any oil on his hands. It's really hard to get off.) At this point, anything's worth a try.

The Rasmussen Reports daily Presidential Tracking Poll for Wednesday shows that 23% of the nation's voters Strongly Approve of the way that Barack Obama is performing his role as president. Forty-five percent (45%) Strongly Disapprove, giving Obama a Presidential Approval Index rating of -22. That’s the lowest Approval Index rating yet measured for this president (see trends).



Linked at Michelle Malkin (buzzworthy)
Most recent posts here.

Testy Obama meets with Senate GOP

Our thin-skinned prez can't take the heat. In a meeting with Republicans, Politico's Manu Raju reports, Obama insisted they "stand up to their base" and work with him (a.k.a., betray their constituents and cave) on immigration reform and energy taxes. Why he thinks they would get on his sinking ship at this point is a mystery to me, but he headed over to the Capitol and made his pitch. He didn't care for the response he got:

"The more he talked, the more he got upset," Sen. Pat Roberts (R-Kan.) said. “He needs to take a valium before he comes in and talks to Republicans and just calm down, and don’t take anything so seriously. If you disagree with someone, it doesn’t mean you’re attacking their motives — and he takes it that way and tends then to lecture and then gets upset.”
No surprise to Obama-watchers. That's how he's been rolling since day one. No one is allowed to disagree with him, criticize him, or get in his way. When they do, he impugns their motives every time. He's been very consistent. Take a look at any major domestic speech. He accuses everyone else of irresponsibly playing politics. Only his motives are pure.

The report has it that McCain took the lead in standing up to Obama:

McCain said he told Obama: "We need to secure the borders first. He didn't agree." A McCain spokeswoman said their exchange was “frank but respectful.”

Shortly after the meeting, Obama called for 1,200 National Guard troops to be deployed to the border, and McCain quickly one-upped the president, asking for 6,000.

Obama also called for a comprehensive immigration plan, an idea McCain seemed to rebuff. And McCain also challenged Obama over constitutional concerns he's raised over Arizona’s controversial immigration law, saying administration officials needed to read the law first.

Addressing McCain and Sen. Jon Kyl (R-Ariz.), Obama said his administration has done more to secure the border than others have.

"But, what he said to McCain and Kyl is that 'solving the problem is not going to just be a function of border security,'" according to a senior White House official. "That was the fault line of the discussion with the president urging Republicans to join him in supporting comprehensive immigration reform which many of them had supported before."

Things have changed a bit since then for John McCain: his seat is being challenged, and Arizona's border crisis has come to a head. So he's not as squishy as he was on immigration reform, much to Obama's dismay.

Sen. Bob Corker called the president out on his "duplicitous" dealings re regulatory reform:

In one of the most heated exchanges of the lunch, Corker accused Obama of acting “duplicitous” in his calls for bipartisanship, saying that he was trying to cut a deal on regulatory reform only to see the rug pulled out from underneath him. At one point, Corker said Obama was using lunch with Republicans as a “prop.”

"I told him I thought there was a degree of audacity in him even showing up today after what had happened with financial regulation," Corker told reporters after Republicans met with Obama.

Obama is still in ram-through mode. Even with the passage of Obamacare, his agenda is unfulfilled. He's getting resistance, and even he can see November from his house. This makes him angry and frustrated. No doubt the ongoing Gulf oil disaster has added a layer to his anxiety.

Republicans came away believing Obama wants to do too much, too fast.

"He wants to do immigration, climate change — all before we go home — he's a very ambitious guy," said Sen. Mike Johanns (R-Neb.). "I think he needs to step back and see where the country is at."

He wants this all done now, Red China-style. If only he could be a dictator for a day . . . .

Love this revealing bit from Lindsey Graham:
“There was some good healthy give-and-take in there,” Graham said. “He believes that he’s bled for the country in terms of giving up political capital and making his base mad. He said that often. … It was at times testy; I think overall it was cordial.”
As ever, it's all about him. A year ago he'd just schedule a prime-time speech. I guess he finally got the message that the more he talks, the less we like what he's selling?


Linked at Michelle Malkin (buzzworthy)

Most recent posts here.

May 25, 2010

Biden gets Memorial Day duties while Obama weekends in Chicago

For the Obamas, Memorial Day weekend begins on Thursday, when the first family leaves town for their Chicago mini-vacation. And Vice President Biden, with his natural gift of grace and dignity, is the go-to guy for anything that qualifies as a BFD. So he's been assigned to lay the traditional wreath at the Tomb of the Unknown Soldier and fill in for the Commander-in-Chief at the White House breakfast for Gold Star families. What could go wrong?


Obama has found a cemetery in Illinois that will allow him to check off the "honor vets" box. Not sure what else he has planned, but Greg Pollowitz has his suspicions:

Unbelievable. If he goes golfing on Monday, I say move to impeach.
Jim Hoft points out that this is the second little vacation for the Obamas since the BP oil disaster began. It's a marvel, an inspiration, even, the way Obama refuses to let these problems cut into his leisure time.

Most recent posts here.

Congressional spend-a-thon rolls on

Congress continues its campaign to bleed America dry.

What's in the latest "jobs" bill? WSJ:

There's $24 billion to help states pay the exploding tab for Medicaid, the same program that ObamaCare expands by some 16 million new recipients. The bill also offers $1 billion for summer jobs for teens, whose jobless rate is 25.4%. Congress could do far more to create teen jobs if it merely suspended last year's minimum wage increase to $7.25 an hour, which priced millions of young workers out of the labor market. But that would be too rational.

The biggest item is $65 billion to prevent a 21% cut in Medicare physician reimbursements. Democrats promised this to the American Medical Association in return for its ObamaCare support, but they left the $65 billion out of the health-care law to make it look less expensive. Now they're pushing it through under separate cover when they assume the press corps won't notice. [. . .]

The sages in Congress continue to claim that these payments for not working will lead to more work. Representative Jim McDermott recently declared on the House floor that jobless payments are "one of the most effective forms of economic stimulus" because "every unemployment dollar spent returns $1.64 of economic benefits." So let's lay off everybody, pay them for not working, and watch the economy really boom. Where do they teach this stuff?

This bill is also one of the most expensive corporate welfare giveaways in recent years with subsidies for municipal bond traders, cotton farmers, yarn producers, sheep growers, Hawaiian sugar cane cooperatives, motor sports businesses, renewable energy firms, the steel lobby, and so on. Any industry that doesn't get a tax credit or other handout in this bill should fire its lobbyist.

And while Congress has its checkbook out . . . hey, let's bail out . . . the unions? Seriously?

A Democratic senator is introducing legislation for a bailout of troubled union pension funds. If passed, the bill could put another $165 billion in liabilities on the shoulders of American taxpayers.

The bill, which would put the Pension Benefit Guarantee Corporation behind struggling pensions for union workers, is being introduced by Senator Bob Casey, (D-Pa.), who says it will save jobs and help people.

As FOX Business Network’s Gerri Willis reported Monday, these pensions are in bad shape; as of 2006, well before the market dropped and recession began, only 6% of these funds were doing well.

Although right now taxpayers could possibly be on the hook for $165 billion, the liability could essentially be unlimited because these pensions have to be paid out until the workers die.

It’s hard to say at the moment what the chances are that the bill will pass. A hearing is scheduled Thursday, which will give the public a sense of where political leaders sit on the topic, said Willis.

Just last week President Obama said there would be no more bailouts.

See Doug Ross for analysis.

And for the very stout-hearted, Doug has a round-up of bad economic news.

As a chaser, watch Sarah Palin. She can see November from her house. (33 minutes in.)

Most recent posts here.

May 24, 2010

Why is Obama failing to deal with oil disaster?

A consensus has formed, on the left and the right, that Obama isn't getting the job done in the Gulf. Theories on why vary from the administration's healthcare monomania, to the president's love of leisure, remoteness from regular Americans, and weakness for the luxe life. Or perhaps he's so afraid of owning this disaster that he refuses to get near it. You choose.

Legal Insurrection: The first victims of Obamacare

From the day Barack Obama took office, the Obama administration and Democrats in Congress have been obsessed and possessed.

Everything took a back seat to passing Obamacare. [. . .]

The most historic administration "since the Great Depression" watched and waited and twiddled its thumbs and dawdled and ditherered and yawned and blamed others and did little when it counted most in the ongoing Gulf oil spill.

The psychological infirmity which gave rise to the obsession with transformation has left this nation weaker abroad, a laughingstock to every tinpot dictator with a Twitter account, a debt-engine heading for a cliff, in a jobless quagmire, and with its first victims.
Read the rest.

Doug Ross: Now is the time on Sprockets vhen ve juxtapose headlines!
Just one question: During a time of severe economic dislocation, rampant unemployment, an oil spill in the gulf, an Iranian nuclear crisis and a Korean peninsula on the brink of war -- try to imagine a fawning media treating a Republican president's opulent, over-the-top party (hosted by Reagan or Bush, for example) like this.

I can't.
Good point. Don't miss Doug's brutal photo essay.

Another Black Conservative: Welcome to Club 1600, the ultimate escape from reality
You know what this spectacle reminds me of, all those dime store dictators and despots who live high off the hog as their people suffer. Castro and Kim Jung Il readily come to mind. Perhaps this “let them eat cake” attitude really is part of the statist ideal.

It really chafes me when I think how this gaudy display was paid for with money stolen from our children’s future and for what? To celebrate a little lying hypocrite who comes over here to bad mouth one of our states? This is just too much to be believed.

If any of the GOP 2012 hopefuls are really smart, they will use these images for one hell of an attack ad.
RTR.

Patterico: Obama golfs as oil gushes

The oil from the BP spill has arrived at Louisiana’s coast and President Obama rushed home to Washington … to go golfing.

Meanwhile, even Democrats are criticizing Obama for his handling of the crisis as the oil continues to gush in the Gulf:

“Is the Obama administration doing a good enough job responding to the BP oil spill?

No, said Cokie Roberts and Donna Brazile on the “This Week” roundtable. “The oil is gushing and we’re being lied to by how much oil is gushing…and the administration has now named a commission,” Cokie Roberts said derisively. “Now this is what you do when you really don’t have anything else to do: you name a commission,” she said. “That’s not going to stop the oil.”

“One of the problems I have with the [Obama] administration is that they’re not tough enough,” Brazile said. “They are waiting for BP to say, ‘oh we have a new plan to stop the oil leak.’ They need to stop it, contain it, clean it up and try and help us conserve our coastal wetlands,” Brazile said.”

Wow. Also critical of Obama, Chris Matthews and James Carville. Matthews, for once, seems to get it:
“The President scares me,” he said. “When is he actually going to do something? And I worry; I know he doesn’t want to take ownership of it. I know politics. He said the minute he says, ‘I’m in charge,’ he takes the blame, but somebody has to. It’s in our interest.”
Well, Matthews gets part of it. What evidence has been produced in the last year and a half that Obama is concerned about what's in our interest? Read the rest.

Then there's always corruption, and good old-fashioned incompetence.

What leadership looks like: Bobby Jindal takes charge.

Most recent posts here.

May 23, 2010

Attention, please: If this happened, it was a felony

Rep. Darrell Issa is trying to bring something to the American people's attention:



Pass it on.

Related post here.

Most recent posts here.

Non nobis, Domine

Non nobis, non nobis, Domine
Sed nomini tuo da gloriam.

Not to us, not to us, O Lord,
But to your name give glory.



Most recent posts here.

May 22, 2010

Nouveau riche Obamas pour it on at state dinner

Don't look to the current residents of the White House for dignity, or a sense of the gravitas of the presidency. In their world, classy=expensive, and more is more. And don't look for any acknowledgment from the Obamas' behavior (words don't count) that many Americans are hurting financially. Byron York reports:

At a time when the unemployment rate stands at 9.9 percent, when jobs are still being lost, when worries about the global economy are causing breathtaking volatility on Wall Street, when millions of Americans who still have jobs are worrying more than ever about the safety of their retirement savings — at a time when all that is going on, the Obama White House has turned itself into a showcase of glitzy extravagance.
Read the rest.

Instead of the elaborate pavilion constructed at unknown expense for the first state dinner, we have an enormous "marquee" tricked out at unknown expense into the Obamas' idea of a real classy nightclub, for the after-dinner partay:
R&B diva Beyonce topped the entertainment bill for the dinner, taking place in the East Room of the White House, with the action later moving to a luxury marquee on the South Lawn of the presidential mansion. The marquee, the size of two-thirds of a football field, decked out in elaborate black decor and nightclub-style lighting, featured a stage and baskets of flowers and models of Monarch butterflies dangling from the ceiling.
Commoners can get a glimpse of the glitz from the White House flickr feed. Here's one of Barack and Michelle gettin' down:


All that's missing is the fiddle.

Hat tip: Power Line

Update: Doug Ross has more pics.

Cross-posted in the Green Room.

Many thanks to Michelle Malkin, Doug Ross, Pirate's Cove, Adrienne's Corner, and Carol's Closet for linking.

Most recent posts here.

ICE may not process Arizona illegals

ICE official John Morton may decline to process illegal aliens from Arizona. Jim Hoft:

John Morton, assistant secretary of homeland security for U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement.

Top Obama official told reporters from the Chicago Tribune today that the administration has no intention of processing illegal aliens referred by Arizona!

He didn't go out on that limb on his own, of course.

FOX News:

“I don’t think the Arizona law, or laws like it, are the solution,” Morton told the newspaper.

The best way to reduce illegal immigration is through a comprehensive federal approach, he said, and not a patchwork of state laws.

Sen. Jeff Sessions:

Sen. Jeff Sessions, R-AL, said it appeared the Obama administration is "nullifying existing law" and suggested Morton may not be the right person for his post if he fails to enforce federal immigration law.

"If he feels he cannot enforce the law, he shouldn't have the job," Sessions told Fox News. "That makes him, in my view, not fulfilling the responsibilities of his office."

Sessions said the U.S. government has "systematically failed" to enforce federal immigration law and claimed Morton's statement is an indication that federal officials do not plan on working with Arizona authorities regarding its controversial law.

"They're telegraphing to every ICE agency in America that they really don't intend on cooperating with Arizona," Sessions said. "The federal government should step up and do it. It's their responsibility."

Krauthammer calls it lawless:



But Judge Andrew Napolitano says ICE has discretion:

Fox News legal analyst Judge Andrew Napolitano said ICE is not obligated to process illegal immigrants referred to them by Arizona authorities.

"ICE has the legal discretion to accept or not to accept persons delivered to it by non-federal personnel," Napolitano said. "It also has the discretion to deport or not to deport persons delivered to it by any government agents, even its own."

In that case, what will happen to the illegal aliens that Arizona apprehends?

Most recent posts here.

SEIU mobs descend on private home, escorted there by DC police; MSM ignores stories

When I first read this -- Union thugs storm the front yards of banking lobbyists, take over some banks -- I thought it was a headline from Greece. But last Sunday's mob action took place in and around our nation's capital. The mob did, in fact, shut down business at several banks by taking over their lobbies. And the 700 NPA community organizers and SEIU thugs bussed into Chevy Chase, Maryland, to harass and intimidate private citizens were escorted there by the DC police. The mob succeeded in terrorizing bank lawyer Gregory Baer's teenage son, who was home alone at the time. He locked himself in the bathroom as they swarmed around the house and onto the front porch.

Where is the msm on this story? My searches are turning up nothing from the Washington Post, for whom this is a local as well as national story, or any other mainstream source. Would any msm types care to look into the how and why of that police escort? Are charges being filed in regard to the mob actions at the banks? Those are the obvious questions. A bit of effort would yield so many more (see first story below). But they're not interested.

First-hand account, and analysis, from neighbor and journalist Nina Easton: What's really behind SEIU's Bank of America protests?

In-depth coverage from the Big sites:
SEIU Storms Private Residence, Terrorizes Teenage Son of Bank of America Exec

NPA-SEIU Terrorizes Child, Breaks Laws – What Did President Obama Know And When Did He Know It?

D.C. Metro Police Escorted SEIU Protesters to Bank Of America Executive’s Home

As SEIU Terrorizes Bank Employee’s Son, HuffPo and MediaMatters Omit Deadbeat Union’s $90 Million Debt

You won't be surprised to learn that the liberal media responded to Nina Easton's coverage with their favorite (and so often, only) weapon: the smear.

Ruby Slippers covers it here and here.
Hot Air has a good summary here.

But if you depended on the mainstream media for your news, you'd never know this happened.

Most recent posts here.

Brewer's frog puppet ad

Intellectual dishonesty 101: Ignorance (feigned or otherwise) enables spin. Ace of Spades:

Of course they've all read the law -- it's ten pages. Claiming to have not read it allows them to speak of vaguely-defined "concerns" without having to point out specific language in the bill they object to -- because if they did the latter, they'd be unable to find anything illegal here.

What they're attempting to do is claim they support, of course, the substance of the bill -- of course they agree with enforcing the border! -- while pretending their objection is over procedural matters. This pose allows them to pretend for the 70% of the country that supports the bill that they're on their side, at least as regards the big substantive goal of the bill.

Read the rest. Then watch the frog puppet:




Most recent posts here.

May 21, 2010

Music break: The Kinks



That calls for another:



Most recent posts here.

Rodents are very common in Washington

But you already knew that.

And a small four-legged one was spotted the other day in the Rose Garden.



See Sister Toldjah for some funny captions.

Most recent posts here.

Your Christie fix

Via Real Clear Politics, a real clear politician. No agonizing here. Christie vetoes tax bills immediately and explains very clearly why higher taxes aren't the answer:

'Millionaires tax' bills pass both houses, but is vetoed by Gov. Christie



Most recent posts here.

Anti-Americanism at the top UPDATE: Mex pirates on Texas lake

A couple of follow-ups to yesterday's outrage.

Krauthammer on Obama's disloyalty:

"You can't have it both ways. Particularly coming from Mexico, a country where if you enter illegally it's a felony and you get up to two years in prison. And if you do it a second time, you get 10 years...So he's got a country which is extremely strict--draconian, if you like--about illegals entering into Mexico. And he's lecturing us on our laws here where it isn't a felony, it's only a misdemeanor. And then, even worse I think, is to see our president refusing to stand up for his own country, joining in the attack on Arizona."

Video here.

Rep. Tom McClintock's strong response to Calderon's and Congress's anti-American behavior here.

Lori Ziganto comments:

Not only do the Democrats fail to figuratively stand up for America, but they literally stand up for and applaud those who seek to condemn it. Worse, it is condemnation from the foreign leader whose own country is a primary source of our illegal immigration issues. All compounded by the fact that Arizona was forced to try to deal with their immense problem on their own, since the weak-willed and spineless folks in attendance at the Joint Meeting of Congress refused to do so.

Our congressional keepers are so full of themselves that they keep forgetting about November. Byron York on that:

The bottom line is that Obama, the Justice Department, and the entire executive branch are on Mexico's side in this dispute. On the other hand, the majority of the American people are with Arizona; a recent Wall Street Journal poll found that 64 percent of Americans support the law.

The issue will play out not only in court but at the ballot box. A few months ago, in another context, Obama said that when political disputes can't be solved by other means, then "that's what elections are for." He's right.

*Update: Via Beltway Confidential, Mexican pirates terrorize boaters on Texas lake:



Keep applauding, Congress.

Cross-posted at Potluck.
Most recent posts here.

May 20, 2010

Contemptible



Whose side are they on? Not ours. That's pretty clear.

Doug Powers:

Any real American president would have shoved this guy out through the garbage exit yesterday, but not this bunch.

Update: See Rep. Tom McClintock's response to this travesty at Dittos Rush! (h/t: Yukio)

Most recent posts here.