Click here for other things we like, including books for kids and grown-ups, music, et cetera. Some detailed kids' books suggestions here. And a great big list here. Many thanks for your purchases.
Your correspondents
Pundit, working feverishly behind the scenes
Pundette, getting all the glory
Testimonials
Carl Scott: Classy. Christian-friendly. Links to lots of good music. Bob Belvedere: Pundette [is] a very proper and classy gal Pat Hickey: Classy, elegant and incisive! Mind-Numbed Robot: Pundit & Pundette is a site that has proved its worth time and time again in the realm of analysis, commentary and aggregation of news from across the political spectrum. It’s written with a style that feels like home cooking and I love the smell of freshly brewed snark in the morning… Diogenes Sarcastica: Finally found a blog that is really fun to read! Chris Wysocki: Her blog is one of the best out there. Facetwitch: Have I mentioned how much P & P rocks? Steve Burri: Pundit & Pundette is hours of fun. You will not be disappointed. Zipline Conservative: I found Pundit and Pundette and think I am smitten.
I loathe this administration as much as the next Pundit or Pundette, but I don't share your enthusiasm for this Ingraham. She's loud, rude, crass, shrill. This is not serious discourse, this is comedy. I'll pass on the pop-corn, give me a barf bag. If this is the state of political journalistic art I won't be leaving my cave very often.
I thoroughly enjoyed that. I'm not the biggest Laura Ingraham fan, but she asked the the questions that liberals refuse to answer and Rangel - well, how does someone like him even stay in Congress? He's crazy.
I don't listen to Laura much anymore. Too much self-promotion, and too much picking on appearance, etc. But I didn't find her shrill here at all. Rangel pretended not to see that her questions about the welfare state, LBJ, liberalism, etc., were all related. He was disingenuous, and rather than let him give pre-fab answers about "inheriting" a bad situation, Bush and the GOP did it, etc., she held him to it. She was very sharp. He was slippery but not slippery enough.
The Regressives want us to think there’s a “war on women” going on, but the fact is, there’s a war on children — which means there’s a war on the future, and the future is losing. What World War II could not accomplish — the complete eradication of whole populations — western-style feminism just might. You’ve come a long way, baby. Michael Walsh
The central fact of our age is the unprecedented, voluntary self-extinction of the developed world. Mark Steyn
I loathe this administration as much as the next Pundit or Pundette, but I don't share your enthusiasm for this Ingraham. She's loud, rude, crass, shrill. This is not serious discourse, this is comedy. I'll pass on the pop-corn, give me a barf bag. If this is the state of political journalistic art I won't be leaving my cave very often.
ReplyDeleteI thoroughly enjoyed that. I'm not the biggest Laura Ingraham fan, but she asked the the questions that liberals refuse to answer and Rangel - well, how does someone like him even stay in Congress? He's crazy.
ReplyDeleteI don't listen to Laura much anymore. Too much self-promotion, and too much picking on appearance, etc. But I didn't find her shrill here at all. Rangel pretended not to see that her questions about the welfare state, LBJ, liberalism, etc., were all related. He was disingenuous, and rather than let him give pre-fab answers about "inheriting" a bad situation, Bush and the GOP did it, etc., she held him to it. She was very sharp. He was slippery but not slippery enough.
ReplyDeleteGreat job Laura!
ReplyDelete