Sometimes the intuitive answer is the right one. Study: 'Callous-unemotional' children often grow up to lie, fight, and bully, study finds:
Remorseless children often develop severe behavioral problems, study findsLet's translate that last part from behaviorist-speak: Instead of rejecting, shaming, or shunning the child, show him love and care the old fashioned way -- hugging, listening, paying attention. "Reinforcement" is for pigeons.
Children who display a lack of emotions such as guilt and remorse often go on to develop severe behavioral problems such as fighting, lying and stealing, a first-of-its-kind, long-term study has found.
"We're not suggesting these children are psychopaths," said Nathalie Fontaine, an assistant professor of criminal justice at Indiana University in Bloomington. "But these [emotional] traits can identify children at risk for persistent and severe antisocial behavior."
The study, which appears in the Journal of Abnormal Psychology, drew on reports from the parents and teachers of roughly 9,500 twins born in England in the mid-1990s, tracking them at ages 7, 9 and 12.
The most worrisome group of children identified in the study - about 5 percent - rated high on a scale of what psychologists call "callous-unemotional traits" at age 7, then continued to exhibit a disturbing lack of normal emotions through age 12.
These children were also at highest risk for destructive, antisocial behavior, including bullying and having trouble making friends. About 80 percent of these high-risk kids were boys.
However, another group of 7-year-olds - 13 percent of those in the study - who initially rated high on the scale of emotional problems improved significantly. By age 12, they displayed a wider range of normal emotions, including remorse.
Fontaine said child psychologists are now eager to understand what factors - which may include improved parenting - led to the emotional health gains seen in this group.
Other research has shown that children who display a lack of guilt and remorse do not improve their behavior when punished. However, there is intriguing evidence that such children respond well - even better than children with more normal emotions - to positive reinforcement.
"Instead of saying, 'You behaved badly today, it's time for a timeout,' it's probably better to say, 'Here's what you did well today,' " Fontaine said.
The kind of time-out in which the child is sentenced to solitary confinement doesn't work, anyway. What I wrote a while back on this:
The “time-out,” a surprisingly ineffective tactic given its near-universal use, will get longer or more frequent when the child isn't compliant. And if [a boy's] parents believe he's spending his alone time deeply regretting that whack he gave his brother, and making a firm purpose of amendment for the future . . . well, it's possible, I suppose. But the likelier scenario is that he's stewing in his resentment toward those who have, in his eyes, wronged him. Under different circumstances he might have arrived at some contrition on his own. As it is, he may now see himself as a victim, and dwell on ways to get even. Ironically, his time in solitary is teaching him a lesson which is the polar opposite of the one his parents had in mind: the importance of personal responsibility and the golden rule.80% of the 'callous-unemotional' kids in the study were boys. Perhaps boys, with their masculine tendency to be more physical and rambunctious, trigger harsh parenting more often than little girls do.
Most recent posts here.