Peter Ferrara on why RINO Romney is the least electable:
Romney the Republican establishment businessman is telling us with his limited, crabbed policy kowtowing to Obama's class warfare rhetoric that he feels, like Bush I and Republican RINO moderates generally, that he cannot explain and defend good supply-side policy to the public. Given his background and who he is as a rich Wall Street takeover artist, he personally may be right about that. Who is going to take seriously a Wall Street millionaire calling for tax cuts for millionaires? That is why he personally is not a good vessel for carrying the Republican standard this year. He is actually a perfect caricature for the neo-Marxist class warfare arguments of Obama and the Occupy Wall Street rabble. That is one reason why Romney, in fact, is the least electable.Or as Dan Riehl put it earlier today:
He feeds right into the concept of a 1%. What a freaking nightmare.Yup. And now that we're all but stuck with him, people are finally taking notice of his glaring weaknesses.
Most recent posts here. Twitter feed here. Amazon store here.
Since there is no consensus of the Anyone but Romney candidate, he will win by default.
ReplyDeleteIt's how he'll do against Obama that is the real worry. Weak.
ReplyDeleteIKE GOT ELECTED TWICE. SO DID NIXON.
ReplyDeleteFORD BARELY LOST - IF HE HADN'T GAFFED ON NYC AND THE WARSAW PACT HE WOULD HAVE WON.
GHWBUSH ONLY LOST BECAUSE OF PEROT.
RIEHL IS NUTS AND THE EXCERPT YOU POSTED IS RIDICULOUS:
ReplyDeleteTHE 1% MEME IS NOT POPULAR; IT IS NOT RESONATING.
MITT IS A TURNAROUND GENIUS AND THAT'S WHAT THE NATION NEEDS.
MITT IS A PROVEN EXECUTIVE.
HE WILL GET 90% OF TH GOP AND 60% OF THE INDS AND WIN.