Today's posts - Quoteworthy - Obamanalysis - Michelle O - Mark Steyn - Women - Children - Parenting - Education - Culture - Culture of death - Music - Sinatra - Books - Best of P&P - Twitter

When a society loses its memory, it descends inevitably into dementia. Mark Steyn
.

March 3, 2012

Under HHS mandate, maybe $1000 a year for contraceptives is about right

Just as Obamacare was predicated on the lie that our healthcare system was "broken," the HHS mandate is predicated on the lie that Americans don't have easy access to contraceptives. Everyone, including myself, has noted that "reproductive justice advocate" and brand-new liberal media darling Sandra Fluke's estimate of the cost of contraceptives is wildly inflated. But perhaps she's on to something after all, because under the HHS mandate, we're not talking about $1 condoms or $9/month generic birth control pills.

As is usual with Obamacare, a closer look reveals that it's significantly worse than you thought. Peter Schweizer reports that the HHS mandate will be a bonanza for Big Pharma:

Forget for a minute the religious question and look at who wins big here: Big Pharma. This mandate is not really about condoms or generic versions of “the pill,” which are available free or cheap in lots of places. This is about brand-name birth control drugs and other devices that some consumers swear off because they are too expensive. The Health and Human Services (HHS) mandate requires health-insurance companies provide contraceptive coverage for all “FDA approved contraceptive methods.” It does not insist on generics. And it does not offer any cost containment.

What’s more, the mandate prevents health-insurance companies from having copays or deductibles for the benefit. This is the perfect set up for Big Pharma. Since the drugs will be paid for by a third party (insurance companies, who will pass the cost on to employers and the rest of us), the consumer won’t worry about the price. Expensive brand names will no doubt see demand rise. Ask more health-care analysts why the cost of medical services continues to rise so rapidly and near the top of the list is the fact that a third-party payment system won’t contain costs.

Back in 2009, many observers were surprised when Big Pharma came out in favor of President Obama’s health-care reform bill. The industry spent millions running television ads in favor of the law and industry lobbyists pushed hard for it.  One important reason they did so was the promise that with the new law they would have a new market of millions of new customers. The contraceptive mandate is a perfect example.
So yes, under the mandate, contraceptives, though they will be "free," will almost certainly become more costly than ever.

But no one's talking about that. Obama and his minions must be positively ecstatic over their success in spinning the HHS anti-conscience mandate into a "war on women." Rush Limbaugh has obliged, proving that the right "hates women" by calling Ms. Fluke a you-know-what, and igniting an orgy of feigned lefty moral indignation, culminating in what might be the silliest phone call ever made by a sitting president. When I first saw reference to it on Twitter I thought it was an absurd joke. But no form of posturing or pandering is beneath this president.

Lost in the shuffle is Obama's outrageous assault on religious liberty. It looks to me like the lies are working pretty well for the left, as is so often the case.

Most recent posts here. Twitter feed here. Amazon store here.

3 comments:

  1. Looking on the bright side, we are being forced to reduce the potential for more libs.

    ReplyDelete
  2. Come to think of it, Fluke did tell the (insider) Congressional Committee that they already knew contraception can cost a woman $1,000 a year: “Without insurance coverage, contraception, as you know, can cost a woman over $3,000 during law school.”

    ReplyDelete
  3. I was having Brunch yesterday after Church. I overheard this man who was dining alone talking on the phone about this issue. He concentrated only on Rush calling her a slut. Said some pretty horrible things about Rush and his wife. So as we were leaving I decided I needed to talk to the man (much to the horror of hubby). I told him that it has nothing to do with birth control. She can take birth control all day long, it is about who is going to pay for it and only the willfully blind (felt liking saying stupid) can't see the difference. He told me that 98% of catholics use b/c (where do they get these numbers from?) and I said that doesn't change the doctrine that the church is based on. He went onto to say the Church needs to update to today's society. I said maybe it does, but that isn't the decision of a Georgetown law student or the president of the U.S. I left him with this thought. One day a liberty that he cared about would be taken away. I won't stand up for his if he isn't willing to stand up for mine. I told them that he was a victim of the media machine who is trying to keep his eye off the real issue, that your constitutional rights are being ebbed away and you are willing them giving them up.

    When I got in the car I told hubby that I was going to live my new banner; I am Breitbart.

    ReplyDelete

You can comment anonymously but please give yourself some kind of name. It makes discussion a lot easier. Thanks.