Today's posts - Quoteworthy - Obamanalysis - Michelle O - Mark Steyn - Women - Children - Parenting - Education - Culture - Culture of death - Music - Sinatra - Books - Best of P&P - Twitter

When a society loses its memory, it descends inevitably into dementia. Mark Steyn
.

October 8, 2012

Lara Logan: ". . . there is a major lie being propagated"

Wow. Lara Logan, who in 2011 was brutally beaten, raped, and almost killed by a mob of animals as she covered the "Arab spring" in Cairo for CBS News, recently spoke very bluntly about the status of what we once called the war on terror and the Obama administration's white-washing of the dangers:

“I chose this subject because, one, I can’t stand, that there is a major lie being propagated . . .” Logan declared in her native South African accent.

The lie is that America’s military might has tamed the Taliban.

“There is this narrative coming out of Washington for the last two years,” Logan said. It is driven in part by “Taliban apologists,” who claim “they are just the poor moderate, gentler, kinder Taliban,” she added sarcastically. “It’s such nonsense!”

Logan stepped way out of the “objective,” journalistic role. The audience was riveted as she told of plowing through reams of documents, and interviewing John Allen, the top U.S. commander in Afghanistan; Afghan President Hamid Karzai, and a Taliban commander trained by al-Qaida. The Taliban and al-Qaida are teaming up and recruiting new terrorists to do us deadly harm, she reports.

She made a passionate case that our government is downplaying the strength of our enemies in Afghanistan and Pakistan, as a rationale of getting us out of the longest war. We have been lulled into believing that the perils are in the past: “You’re not listening to what the people who are fighting you say about this fight. In your arrogance, you think you write the script.”

Our enemies are writing the story, she suggests, and there’s no happy ending for us.
That sounds more like Mark Steyn than it does the watered-down, barely-there "reporting" we've been getting from the liberal media since Obama took office.

I imagine the murder of Ambassador Stevens and three other Americans in Libya struck a painful chord with Ms. Logan:
Logan even called for retribution for the recent terrorist killings of Christopher Stevens, the U.S. ambassador to Libya, and three other officials. The event is a harbinger of our vulnerability, she said. Logan hopes that America will “exact revenge and let the world know that the United States will not be attacked on its own soil. That its ambassadors will not be murdered, and that the United States will not stand by and do nothing about it.”
But "standing by and doing nothing about it" is precisely what President Obama is doing and no one expects anything different from him. By the way, are we ever going to find out what happened that night, and how Amb. Stevens really died? As far as I know, no one is even asking the questions.

If you come across a transcript of the entire speech, kindly pass it on.

Hat tip: Lonely Conservative

Many thanks to Michelle Malkin for the Buzzworthy link.

***
Mea culpa: I omitted the link to the SunTimes story, which I've now added above.
***
Most recent posts here. Follow us on Twitter here. Amazon store here.

9 comments:

  1. "But "standing by and doing nothing about it" is precisely what President Obama is doing"

    - can we please stop with the automatic anti-Obama knee jerk? Yes, the embassy was attacked. The ambassador was murdered. But what would you have the US do? Nuke the city?

    - I'm comfortable in saying that _everyone_ is searching diligently to find the guilty parties. And once they've been identified, I sure wouldn't take out life insurance on them.

    - The Israelis took a couple of decades, but eventually they tracked down and retaliated against the Munich murderers. They didn't jump and scream and demand nuking, well, some town or city or another.

    signed, cynical rationalist

    ReplyDelete
  2. Well, cynical rationalist, one thing the administration could have done is to not blame the situation on some YouTube video. That kind of made it look like they were, well....deflectiong.

    Just saying.

    ReplyDelete
  3. What knee jerk? What did Obama do? When he heard the consulate in Benghazi (which had been begging for more security for months, and every day that week) was being attacked by guys with AK-47s and grenade launchers, he went to bed. The next day he flew to Vegas for a fund-raiser. He sent Hillary and Rice out to lie - it was just a mob upset about a video! Then he had the filmmaker brought in for questioning in the middle of the night.

    He sent the message that violence against America gets good results.

    This administration's Mideast policy has been a trainwreck, worse than Carter's. That's no kneejerk.

    ReplyDelete
  4. Woo-hoo, back in! Google kept eating my comments, but no longer, it seems.

    ReplyDelete
  5. Perhaps we should be asking the question, "What would Russia do?" or "What would China do?" You'll notice there's been very little Muslim uproar directed towards Russia and none that I'm aware of directed towards China. The Chechen Muslims tried holding a theater hostage and that got them nothing but killed along with more retaliation on their own soil. And we've all seen how China deals with their "dissidents".

    If not a thermonuclear response then how about some mosque targeting with "bacon bombs"? After all, if they're going to attack Christians and Jews in their houses of worship and use their mosques as staging areas and ammo dumps then the mosques are legitimate targets. Let the rest of Islam know this is the price they pay for not keeping their radicals under control.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. The Russians killed lots of hostages (their own people) by pumping a strong narcotic gas into the theater. Not the kind of resolve those people were hoping for, I'm sure.

      But one thing the Russians did right was desecrating the corpses of the terrorists. They wrapped them in the carcasses of pigs and buried them under pig-sties. This wasn't an attack on Islam, it was retribution for terrorism - why should we respect the burial practices of such? And it's a great deterrent for those counting on an afterlife in some celestial virgin brothel.

      (That was an effective tactic of Genghis Khan's, you know. His soldiers hacked off the heads of enemy dead and piled them into mounds, making ritual burial impossible. Best to surrender, or you risk the afterlife!)

      Our real enemies, the radical Islamist terrorists, would like it if we bacon-bombed random mosques. We'd radicalize them some recruits. It's a target rich environment, Ralph. We don't have to go after Average Joe Prayermat.

      Delete
  6. My personal feeling is that any cleric who issues a fatwa against America or Americans for ny reason should no longer be considered a cleric, he is a general and should be targeted as an enemy combatant. Kill enough of them and possibly no more fatwas! I am simply tired of an disgusted by these people. TexasMom2012

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Sorry, should read for ANY reason.

      Delete
  7. I was really glad to see Laura come out with this. She has learned the hard way and may be able to reach some of those still lost in the "bubble".
    God be with her.

    ReplyDelete

You can comment anonymously but please give yourself some kind of name. It makes discussion a lot easier. Thanks.