I think so. Here's some excellent analysis from George Weigel (and Alexis de Tocqueville):
That half the country was prepared to reelect a manifestly failed president whose personal incapacities, like the incapacities of the bloated governmental bureaucracies over which he presided, were on full display in the weeks before the election, and in venues ranging from North Africa to Staten Island, is a very disturbing “indicator,” as the pollsters like to say. That a goodly proportion of that half of America seemed susceptible to the Obama campaign’s class warfare is also disturbing. But perhaps most disturbing of all is the exit-poll data showing that a healthy majority of the electorate believed Obama more capable than Romney of handling foreign crises: and this, after the lethal fiasco of Benghazi, itself the embodiment of an ideologically driven pusillanimity in foreign policy that has been on display since the president’s apologize-for-America tour at the beginning of his first term. “Missing greatness,” it turns out, is not just a function of who’s in charge. It’s a result of democratic citizens’ not paying attention. Or worse, it’s the result of citizens’ suffering such severe ideological glaucoma that they cannot see what is in front of them.Read the whole thing.
What has obviously changed, in other words, is American political culture: and it is hard to make a case that that change has been for the better. Shortly after Ohio sealed the deal on Election Night, a friend (who earlier in the evening had said that she was having a hard time recognizing the country she grew up in) sent me an e-mail with a salient Tocqueville quote:
In the United States, the majority rules in the name of the people. This majority is chiefly composed of peaceful citizens who by taste or interest sincerely desire the good of the country. . . . If republican principles are to perish in America, they will succumb only after a long social travail, frequently interrupted, often resumed; they will seem to be reborn several times, and they will disappear without return only when an entirely new people has taken the place of the one that exists in our day.
David Gelernter has a partial explanation for the degradation of the electorate. It's the schools, stupid:
. . . you can’t graduate class after class after class of left-indoctrinated ignoramuses without paying the price. Last night was a downpayment.Mr. Gelernter goes on to make a hopeful statement about righting our education system. I don't share his optimism at all. Our public school system is a deeply-entrenched leviathan. And most parents, products of it themselves (and unable to imagine their lives without state-sponsored daycare) aren't all that unhappy with it. Where will all this big change come from?
If you want your kids to arrive at adulthood un-co-opted by liberal group-think, be a radical and homeschool them.
Most recent posts here. Follow us on Twitter here. Amazon store here.


Unfortunately, there just aren't enough homeschoolers to save the world. Methinks things are going to get a whole lot more horrific before (if ever) they get better.
ReplyDelete"If you want your kids to arrive at adulthood un-co-opted by liberal group-think, be a radical and homeschool them."
ReplyDeleteTranslation: If you want to raise conservative kids - don't expose them to the outside world.
Not exactly a recipe for success, that. Considering the changing demographics of the nation as a whole.
I'd paraphrase Clive James
"People who are afraid of what [public education] is doing to the world, are probably just afraid of the world."
Wrong. That vision of homeschooled kids huddled in fear inside Mom and Dad's bunker studying scripture and nothing else doesn't reflect reality at all. Homeschooled kids are out there, and are well-prepared to deal with the "outside world." Homeschooling strengthens the family and that strengthens the individual.
ReplyDeleteAs for success, homeschooling actually IS the recipe for that. From last week's Washington Post:
"The National Home Education Research Institute estimates that there were 2.04 million home-schooled children in the United States as of 2010, about 4 percent of the nation’s school-age population. That’s almost double the 1.2 million home-schooled children in 2000. A June article in U.S. News & World Report said that home-schooled children graduate from college at higher rates than their peers, earn higher GPAs and are better socialized than most high school students."
http://www.washingtonpost.com/lifestyle/magazine/home-schooling-pioneer-susan-wise-bauer-is-well-versed-in-controversy/2012/10/29/521a3070-da80-11e1-9745-d9ae6098d493_story.html
Judging from the testimony of public school kids here -- http://www.punditandpundette.com/2011/11/getting-know-where-public-school-kids.html -- they're the ones who fear the world. Not their fault, of course, but they frequently mention the "real world," and not with a lot of confidence.
jill,
ReplyDeleteThat would be you arguing with yourself. _You're_ the one suggesting that children need to be shielded from the corrupting influence of the outside world.
Home schooled kids can of course do very well in the world. But if the lesson you're drawing from this election is that conservative values can't survive contact with public education - then you have even less faith in their durability than I do.
I'd say homeschooled kids have a better chance of growing into independent adults who've retained their natural curiosity and initiative. "Shielded" wasn't my word.
ReplyDeleteMy homeschooled children and public schooled child have a better understanding of the world than their peers. They have studied logic and recognize nonsense when they see it. My public school child's friends were lacking in common sense and had a profound inability to back up any arguement with anything other than feelings. This generation has the greastest access to knowledge and the least interest in its pursuit.
ReplyDeleteMy children have no fear of the world. They feel sorry for the kids with no tolerance to see beyond their narrow views. My kids are not the ones in a bubble of ignorance.
Something got lost along the way here - the point wasn't 'the outside world,' but the pernicious influence of the academy, indoctrinating kids from a very early age with what ends up being quite the opposite of liberal thought in the original, true, and very beautiful sense of the term, instead substituting a rubber-stamped cultural identity self-righteously calling itself 'liberal,' but amounting to, in Mark Steyn's brilliant metaphor, everybody's car having the identical 'Celebrate Diversity' bumper sticker on it.
ReplyDelete