April 26, 2013

Gosnell's SOP, part 2

Rep. Chris Smith, yesterday on the House floor:



Here's the Timothy Carney column mentioned. I don't usually post entire articles by others but have to make an exception in this case:

When the pro-choice group RH Reality Check hosted a conference call today on abortionist Kermit Gosnell, the speakers focussed entirely on the substandard care Gosnell provided the mothers. But violating sanitation regulations is not really why Gosnell is on trial. He’s been charged with killing people — mostly babies.

So I asked the call participants, “What is the distinction between what he did, and what a late-term abortionist like, say, LeRoy Carhart does?”

Tracy Weitz, associate professor at the University of California, San Francisco, explained: “When a procedure that usually involves the collapsing of the skull is done, it’s usually done when the fetus is still in the uterus, not when the fetus has been delivered.”

Dr. Weitz added that third-trimester abortions involve “euthanizing” the baby with a chemical injection, and then basically going through labor and delivery.

Here’s the full transcript of Weitz’s response:

I think it’s important to recognize that this particular procedure is nowhere in the medical literature. When a procedure that usually involves the collapsing of the skull is done, it’s usually done when the fetus is still in the uterus, not when the fetus has been delivered.

So this technique that he does is nowhere in the lexicon of practice in abortion care. So, in terms of thinking about the difference between the way abortion providers who do later abortions in the United States practice, and this particular practice, they are completely worlds apart.

Traditionally, when that procedure is done which involves the collapsing of the skull, it’s done at the junction between the later second trimester and the beginning of the third trimester — that’s around 24 weeks. It is not done at this significantly later period.

When inductions for delivery — that is, in the third trimester, when procedures are performed, when abortions are performed, they are usually done as inductions. That is, they look much more like a labor and delivery. And the fetus is traditionally euthanized before that procedure is initiated. Two drugs, either potassium chloride or digoxin, are used to make sure that the fetus is not living before the procedure is initiated.

So the take-home message is that later abortion is a very, sort of, complicated, and I think emotionally highly charged discussion point. But the way in which this practice has done has nothing to do with the way in which the standard of care and later abortion procedures are performed in the United States. 
Emphasis mine. Wow. "Worlds apart"? Are you sure about that?

But Dr. Weitz is correct about this being nowhere in the medical literature. The grand jury went into that, explaining that what Gosnell routinely did was different from the usual ghastly partial birth abortion method employed by the likes of Carhart:
This was not the procedure Gosnell used. Under further questioning, Massof acknowledged that Gosnell and he almost always cut the spinal cords, and sometimes suctioned skulls as well, after the babies were fully expelled by their mothers, when there was clearly no need or medical reason to collapse the skull.

Tina Baldwin’s testimony also made it clear that Gosnell was not cutting spinal cords, crushing babies’ skulls, or suctioning in order to allow the head to pass through the cervix. Even while claiming that Gosnell sometimes suctioned a fetus’s skull in order to get it through the birth canal, her description of his technique belied her claim: She said that he would “crack” the neck after the head was out – when only the baby’s torso was still inside the mother – and then suction the brain matter out.
Tina Baldwin testified that she saw this done "hundreds" of times. Read more here, Kermit Gosnell's standard operating procedure, or in the grand jury report, pp. 108-11.

No one knows why Gosnell suctioned out the brains and collapsed the skulls of babies that were already fully delivered. And since he won't be taking the stand, no one will be able to ask him to explain it.

***
Thanks to Pewsitter.com for linking.

***
Most recent posts here. Follow us on Twitter here. Amazon store here. Facebook page here.

4 comments:

  1. Isn't euthanasia the same thing as killing?

    ReplyDelete
  2. Yes indeed. The phrase, "to make sure the fetus is no longer living" is a bit chilling, too, no?

    ReplyDelete
  3. "He enjoyed it." I'm going to go cry for a little while now. Humanity and/or Western Civ, it was nice knowin ya.

    ReplyDelete
  4. If he is not convicted, then our only recourse is prayer. Only grace can break hearts of stone.

    ReplyDelete

You can comment anonymously but please give yourself some kind of name. It makes discussion a lot easier. Thanks.