June 20, 2013

A high price

Today's must-read is David French's piece, When Love Grows Cold, on the toll feminism has taken on our most intimate and important relationships:

One of the worst aspects of modern feminism has been its determined effort to turn mothers against their own children — to deem children not blessings to be loved but instead threats to all-important careers and self-fulfillment. My post yesterday — linking to the terrible story of a woman [Penelope Trunk] who aborted her child (late in her pregnancy) to preserve a short-lived volleyball career — is an extreme example, but the phenomenon crops up in other contexts as well. [. . .]

An amazing thing happens to many millions of parents — they experience an intense love and deep bond that is difficult to explain to those who’ve not had children. It’s overpowering, and — critically — it’s lifechanging. For millions of women (not all, of course), it creates an intense desire to care for their children, to be in their presence as much as possible. For millions of men (not all, of course), it triggers a similarly intense desire to protect and provide — causing many of us to take our career responsibilities truly seriously for the first time. Not as the ambitious dreamer of our pre-child life, but as the more serious and dutiful provider who recognizes that our family’s security depends on the outcome of our work.

Given that reality, is it any wonder that many women pull back in their careers, even as men push forward? And given that this action reflects the deep longing of both their hearts, is it actually a cultural problem? Make no mistake, there are women across this land who are deeply engaged in their careers not because it fulfills them, but because they must work to make ends meet.  Many of them long for the financial freedom to return home. Similarly, there are men across this land who desperately wish that they made more money, that they were more successful, so their wives could be their children’s primary caregiver.

Those values and longings are not universal, nor should they be cultural or political mandates, but they are virtuous. They are good for families and children. They are not the only way, but they are a good way  – a very good way.

Why then must feminists try to shame women out of embracing the deep desires of their heart? Why must even mothers and friends lobby their daughters and sisters into hiring doctors to commit ultimate acts of violence — to utterly reject even the most basic obligations of caregiving and love?
My emphasis there. It takes a certain amount of courage and independence of mind these days for young women to embrace traditional femininity and maternity. Read the rest of French's post and pass it on to young women and men in your acquaintance, who may never hear anything like it from anyone else they know. When she got pregnant the first time, Penelope Trunk seems to have received only one kind of advice from everyone, including her mother -- get rid of the baby. She ends her piece with a question:
I think about the men I was with when I had the abortions. They were not bad men. One is my ex-husband. So much of life is a gamble, and I think I might have had as good a chance of staying together with the first guy as I did with my ex-husband. And I am not sure that my life would have turned out worse if I had had kids early. I am not sure it would have turned out better. I'm not even sure it would have been that different.

You never know, not really. There is little certainty. But there are some certain truths: It's very hard to have an abortion. And, there is not a perfect time to have kids.

And I wonder, are there other women out there who had abortions in the name of their career and their potential? What do those women think now?
There are more than 600 comments but I don't have the time, or the heart, to dive into them.

Many thanks to Pewsitter for the link.

Most recent posts here. Follow us on Twitter here. Amazon store here. New Facebook page here.


  1. And you know what? Gay marriage will just put a nail on that coffin. It will all just be about individuals, the state, and the economic relationship between the two. No room for the desires of the heart. Mark my words.

  2. Emasculation of every man, boy and child is the price for militant feminism. Gay-marriage, the eradication of virility, masculinity and virtue is the price for the rise of militant feminism. Going down into the pit is easier than standing up for truth or loving one another. The asinine sphincter of another man is the homosexual practitioner's bride. At least save the English language.

  3. Just my two cents, but Feminism is a simple concept: blaming all men for the failings of some men; the politically correct, irrational, unending hatred of men; the political movement aimed at the destruction of male resources.
    There is simply nothing in the universe that men can do to reach any form of reconciliation with Feminists over their own existence.


You can comment anonymously but please give yourself some kind of name. It makes discussion a lot easier. Thanks.